OK, my wording was slack, 'they' (SawStop's Parent company) leased the technology to Festool, a company they owned. Does it change my point at all? I feel like you're arguing technicalities while ignoring the point: SawStop do not prioritise our safety above all other things.
They claimed and fought dozens of patents to ensure the barrier for entry was high and blocked the US market, making it more difficult and less financially sensible for other companies to bring products to market.
Festool do two versions of the TK80 model, the £3k one (with stand) and the £1800 one. I should know, I dearly wanted one, and have been waiting for the price to come down, but still can't afford it.
Again, you're kind of avoiding the point and arguing about trivial items in relation to the larger issue here.
The latter point isn't even mentioned on this thread as far as I recall, so your point about 'having common sense and reading this thread' was both unnecessary (since I'd read it), rude, (since it was an assumption which you've clearly got no evidence to back up) and misdirection, since the points you're raising aren't even covered.
SS's accounts are a matter of public record, they broke even in ~2004. But your 'facts' are the seeming absence of my references? Ironic, really.
What's your angle here? Are they paying you? Or are you otherwise emotionally invested in them? This is a wierd take, to be fair. Or maybe your'e a bit starstruck because their MD is on here?
Dude, the company could have save THOUSANDS OF LIVES* A YEAR. THOUSANDS.
*literally as well as careers and limbs
The only reason they're 'sharing' some of the tech now is because their patent expired.
Sorry, I'm not trying to be a hater, but they used the phrase "Your safety is our top priority". That's a flat-out shameless lie.