Not really, midnight to 06:00, 5p kWh every night which equates nicely to 1p per mile fuel cost. I'll take that thank you.Assuming they are able to do that. My understanding is that this option is dependent on a lot of external factors.
Not really, midnight to 06:00, 5p kWh every night which equates nicely to 1p per mile fuel cost. I'll take that thank you.Assuming they are able to do that. My understanding is that this option is dependent on a lot of external factors.
In reality it does around 235 miles on a full charge dependent on speed more than anything else. It's no different to ICE cars which are quoted MPG figures which they never achieve.WhatCar review.
View attachment 188850
Also the review pointed out that 'Just bear in mind that, like all electric models, the MG5 is unlikely to achieve that quoted figure in real-world driving conditions (expect more like 200 miles from a full charge of the battery).
Not sure about mainland Europe but nothing to stop that design in the UK. I built a lotus 7 replica and it has open wheels, the same as a Caterham 7. Aerial Atoms and numerous other similar cars also have open wheel gaps.I suspect Aptera would not be legal in the EU. The axle and suspension struts are in a gap to the wheel pods and would be a deathtrap for pedestrians. Personally I would not even consider a three wheeler either, unless it was very low speed.
Yes of course BUT the Q7 wouldnt have achieved the MPG figure in the specification sheet which is the argument here.^^ Indeed. The absolute maximum range that the dash shows on my current Tesla X (100 whatevers battery version) is 320 on a full charge. This is fiction. However, if I drive in a measured way, I have achieved 280 on mainly motorway roads, using cruise control and auto drive (gimmick) to Europe. Which we do often. We do a quick top up and coffee break in Brugge. That is OK. On the other hand if we went in an Audi Q7 diesel, we could do it with no stops at higher speeds and still have significant range left.
I saw one of those in Bournemouth a while ago. Beautiful car. Bit pricey though!we were at Pembrey track last weekend and among other cars on show was the new MG sports car. We agreed that it looks fantastic, and with specs like those, it's hard to imagine when you'd need more power.
https://www.mgcyberster.co.uk/
So which car are you talking about?Not really, midnight to 06:00, 5p kWh every night which equates nicely to 1p per mile fuel cost. I'll take that thank you.
Quoting myself: I just heard on the radio that EDF are offering a tariff with free electricity on Sundays. For the mileage I do, that would mean free charging.I am actually the perfect customer for an EV: I rarely do more than 100 miles a week and always park at home.
Tesla aren't the only ones making fast chargers, and it isn't as if there is a total lack of chargers in the area...Did anyone else notice the dearth of superchargers on that map around the Leicester area? Oh err!
Both, MG5 and BMW i3So which car are you talking about?
That is true but you don't normally charge from empty to full every night. I only need to replace the amount of energy I use in a day. at 7.2 kW I can replace 216 miles during the 6 hours overnight, if I really wanted the full range I could start the charge earlier at 13.37p kWh giving me 1.8p per mile.I've just pulled the stats off the MG website for the MG5 EV Estate that you highlighted and it's much longer than 6 hours to charge from 10 to 100%. In fact 10 hours at 7kw and of note is that is at a temperature of 25c
https://www.mg.co.uk/new-cars/mg5-ev
That is what I said,is that the battery is a low slung slab at chassis level.
It would not be difficult to just have motors built into the hubs, especially in the rear unsteered wheels and with a 4x4 configuration under electronic control then traction could be maintained without the risk of skidding, no need for diffs in axles or between front & rear so the potential is there once battery technology gets there.keep there mass as low as possible for better handling
AWD is already quite common in EV's (hub motors on the other hand aren't really that desirable- they already exist, but using them means more unsprung weight on the tyres- which reduces handling, and increases tyre wear...)That is what I said,
It would not be difficult to just have motors built into the hubs, especially in the rear unsteered wheels and with a 4x4 configuration under electronic control then traction could be maintained without the risk of skidding, no need for diffs in axles or between front & rear so the potential is there once battery technology gets there.
Total aerodynamic resistance is (AIUI) drag coefficient x frontal area.Not sure about mainland Europe but nothing to stop that design in the UK. I built a lotus 7 replica and it has open wheels, the same as a Caterham 7. Aerial Atoms and numerous other similar cars also have open wheel gaps.
The Coefficient of drag on a Caterham is about 0.7 though! it's slightly better than a brick!
ICE cars currently have around double the range of a typical mid range EV - say 500 vs 250 miles.In reality it does around 235 miles on a full charge dependent on speed more than anything else. It's no different to ICE cars which are quoted MPG figures which they never achieve.
There are probably more chargers than conventional garages in the area - but:Tesla aren't the only ones making fast chargers, and it isn't as if there is a total lack of chargers in the area...
View attachment 188876
As they don't have a scale on their maps (rather dumb lol)- here's a google maps shot of the same area for those unaware of the distances involved... with a distance scale top left...
View attachment 188877
So within a circle measuring approximately 5km across contains 5 ultrarapid 150kw + chargers, 10 rapid (50kw-150kw) chargers, 5 fast (8-50kw) chargers, and too many to count without expanding the map further slow chargers...
I prefer Plugshare, here's their map...
View attachment 188879
https://www.plugshare.com/
To see for yourself just how many are in an area, go there and type in the town name you want... (if you hover over the marker, it gives you its details- orange is a 'fast charger', green is a 'slower' charger
No argument with that at all.ICE cars currently have around double the range of a typical mid range EV - say 500 vs 250 miles.
This is simply not the case, most EV's get to 80% in a maximum of 40 minutes and thats where you stop charge and journey continues.Recharging is 5 minutes vs +/- an hour at a fast charge.
Not sure of the point youre making hereFurther issues:
- the cautious tend to refuel whilst there is some range left in the tank/battery - not run it down to the fuel warning light or 10% charge.
I think you mean rapid chargers, fast chargers are the 7 kW units that people have at home I would guess better availability of fast chargers compared to petrol pumps but fewer rapid chargers than petrol pumps.
- as petrol tends have better availability than fast chargers, the residual capacity required before range anxiety sets in may be greater for electricity
I suspect that if a petrol car was used for a 3 mile journey in winter conditions the downgrade of range would be similar. An EV can have heated the battery up and the car interior, defrosted the windows etc all before you start to use the battery range.
- whilst both fuels are subject to efficiency losses with low temperatures, this is usually more pronounced with EVs.
It's nothing like 30% on either of my EV's. My i3 drops from 145 in the summer to 120 in the coldest of days. The MG5 from 255 miles in the summer to 225 in winter.Putting some numbers to this - assuming 100% full at the start of a journey with fill up required when remaining range falls to 50 miles:
- an ICE with 500 miles total range has an effective range of 450 miles. In winter ~zero UK temperatures could reduce range by ~10% giving an effective range of 400 miles.
- an EV with 250 miles total range has an effective range of 200 miles. In winter ~zero UK temperatures could reduce range by ~30% giving an effective 125 miles.
And an amazing amout of data protrayed by people that really dont know. I have been a petrolhead all of my life until 8 years ago when I was converted to EV. I had some very nice ICE vehicles in the past but experiencing all aspects of EV's I would not go back. Not for environmental reasons purely the way an EV drives, the smoothness, the performance and the incredibly low running costs.I have no problems with EV and believe they will be the future. But there is far too much rose tinted selective arguments from both sides of the debate
With my diesel I tend to only half fill the tank generally. As I do mostly short trips it doesn't make a lot of sense to me to carry 25-30kg of extra fuel with me everywhere i go, when half a tank will get me well over 250miles.the cautious tend to refuel whilst there is some range left in the tank/battery - not run it down to the fuel warning light or 10% charge.
Enter your email address to join: