RogerS
Established Member
Rorschach":jh664wdx said:MrTeroo":jh664wdx said:
What a shame that website is a looney bin.
Agreed.
Rorschach":jh664wdx said:MrTeroo":jh664wdx said:
What a shame that website is a looney bin.
Rorschach":1o68ojc6 said:What a shame that website is a looney bin.
RogerS":1o68ojc6 said:Agreed.
Droogs":2ya2sbvb said:Is it a coincidence they are promoted by the government and they were as I have been informed by SWMBO (Who is utterly against) invented by the brother of the engergy minister. you decide, they are also linked to serious health issues. so not having one at any time
Droogs":2xcoocfo said:Apparently they are linked to causes of various cancers, brain disorders etc. As I say been told this by SWMBO who jumped down my throat when I asked if we were getting one.
Rorschach":3m4dngk2 said:Droogs":3m4dngk2 said:Apparently they are linked to causes of various cancers, brain disorders etc. As I say been told this by SWMBO who jumped down my throat when I asked if we were getting one.
SWMBO must have missed the next line about protecting yourself with a tin foil hat. There is no link to cancer, brain disorders, rabies, foot and mouth etc.
novocaine":13hjlto6 said:Rorschach":13hjlto6 said:Droogs":13hjlto6 said:Apparently they are linked to causes of various cancers, brain disorders etc. As I say been told this by SWMBO who jumped down my throat when I asked if we were getting one.
SWMBO must have missed the next line about protecting yourself with a tin foil hat. There is no link to cancer, brain disorders, rabies, foot and mouth etc.
tin foil has been linked to Alzheimer.
RogerS":1gfw4zjx said:I don't think so. Can you point to a peer-reviewed research paper? The Canadian Alzheimer's Society says that it is inconclusive. And that only after a quick Google.
Of course, there is the excellent scientific journal 'Daily Mail'. !
phil.p":1rxb9wua said:I see no reason why the electricity charges shouldn't be more variable. I have Economy 7 from necessity, but why can it not be more variable for all? The largest spike in energy use is between something like 5.00pm and 6.30pm - why is this not the most expensive power of the day? Much of the usage is people coming in from work and switching everything on, when much of it could be done by timers to run at the cheapest (or at least cheaper) time of the cycle. If the low is say 3.00am to 5.00am, that's when the washing machine should come on. Likewise tumble driers if they were made to be low fire risk - which they should be anyway. If the power used at peak were spread even by an hour or two it would be one fewer power stations we need - and we're coming to a time of inadequate generation so it should be seriously thought about now. I suspect ultimately that this is what smart meters are designed for, rather than to deter you from using your kettle full up.
Rorschach":3h6ahl4r said:Robbo3":3h6ahl4r said:My opinion - biggest scam going.
It's to save on either contracting out or having to employ people to read the meters thus increasing their already bloated profits. See who actually receives the profits from the water, power & train companies.
If it were that simple then they would just introduce a charge to have your meter read and those that submit their own readings would pay less.
It's about control, being able to quickly and easy shut down the power supply.
Enter your email address to join: