In what markets, do you think sawstop will takeover ? Do you really think it will replace products from companies like Itech and SCM in the industrial market.
Sawstop is not but it seems bigger industrial brands like Altendorf are looking in this direction. When you look at tablesaws there are two distinct groups which also tend to fall into the home user or industrial. If you have a large sliding table saw then there is no reason at all to work close to the blade but us home users with limited space do not have this luxury.It is not aimed at the industrial market as you are well aware.
Were life altering accidents a frequent feature of these woodworking programs?..... Having the SawStops will save some kids from having a life altering accident. Pretty much all the schools here have done the same or shut down their woodworking programs completely.
I suspect probably not, but authorities scared there might be.Were life altering accidents a frequent feature of these woodworking programs?
Basically Sawstop seems to be a big money-making rip-off based on scaremongering about accidents, particularly amongst the amateur and beginner fraternity.I suspect probably not, but authorities scared there might be.
Our own schools are doing the same sadly. My son's had very well equipped metal and wood work shops, all now out of use with the "very dangerous" machines like lathes, saws and milling machines all off limits.
They had five Harrison 140 lathes and several Bridgeport mills all gathering dust because they were deemed too dangerous for the pupils to use. Similar in the woodwork shop, table saw bandsaw and lathe off limits to the pupils.
As a retired HOD of a D&T departments I'm afraid the reason that school workshops have declined so dramatically since most of us were pupils, is that there just aren’t enough competent practical qualified people to teach the skills.I suspect probably not, but authorities scared there might be.
Our own schools are doing the same sadly. My son's had very well equipped metal and wood work shops, all now out of use with the "very dangerous" machines like lathes, saws and milling machines all off limits.
They had five Harrison 140 lathes and several Bridgeport mills all gathering dust because they were deemed too dangerous for the pupils to use. Similar in the woodwork shop, table saw bandsaw and lathe off limits to the pupils.
That is a good start towards safety, to take that further it would be better if before the saw was used that you had to touch the blade to engage a safety relay with force guided contacts that then allowed the machine to run, think about RCD's and that many people put there faith in them but never do periodic testing .So you can touch the blade while saw is switched off and see the system detecting your finger.
No mater how many safety features are used there will always be accidents otherwise we would not have the Darwin awards !A few basic lessons in safe use would be much more useful
When was the last time you set off all of your car airbags to test they actually work?Then the sawstop itself, still not convinced because having worked with high integrity safety systems then a key part of these is testing to confirm that you know that upon demand this safety system will prevent the hazzard from being realised. So this sawstop that is preventing it from causing harm must be failsafe, ie if the safety system is not working then it must prevent the saw from working so how is this achieved. Also just like E stops and RCD's you need a periodic test to confirm operation, can this be done ?
Lazers cut by burning. Try ripping a 6ft long 4inch piece of oak by burning through it with a lazer and see how long it takes, the power required and the finish you'll get, and you'll have the answer.Back to the initial topic of safety. I was thinking the other day why haven’t the mechanical parts and blades of bandsaws and table saws been replaced by a cutting laser. The momentum of the blades is the real hazard, a laser would turn off instantly. I’m probably showing my ignorance about lasers.
I test my push-sticks every time I use them. Luckily it's a non-destructive process but even if it wasn't they are dirt cheap. I make copies from ply or mdf scraps. They do get the odd nick, but that's the whole idea - it's instead of getting the odd nick on your hand.When was the last time you set off all of your car airbags to test they actually work?
I find push sticks really hard to drive with, although if you get good you can sit in the back seats.I test my push-sticks every time I use them. Luckily it's a non-destructive process but even if it wasn't they are dirt cheap. I make copies from ply or mdf scraps. They do get the odd nick, but that's the whole idea - it's instead of getting the odd nick on your hand.
Do you get cuts from your steering wheel? You can get covers for them you know, all colours and patterns. Leopard skin even!I find push sticks really hard to drive with, although if you get good you can sit in the back seats.
It's much easier and more effective to teach people how to work safely, rather than persuading them to fork out £Ks on every machine they are likely to encounter in their lives, and just ignore safe practices.This is oncourse to be another 'Just use push sticks/training' vs 'some people don't listen/safety fall back' thread.
Life would be pretty simple if everyone did everything perfectly all of the time. If you think the answer to reducing tablesaw accidents is to advise people to work safely, have a think about litter. Walk down a street and look at the litter that people drop. It isn't hard to put it in a bin when you see one, there are plenty of bins around, there are loads of adverts about not littering and even on the packets themselves, you can even get fined £100 for dropping litter, their parents probably even said don't litter. If we can't get people to put the rubbish they are holding in a bin all of the time, what are the chances you'll get everyone to work safely on a tablesaw all of the time?
I know this is your hobby horse Jacob but the issue is not training. The issue is inattention due to distraction or tiredness in fallible or ageing humans. The secondary issue is insurers assessing the risks of safety in any workplace where people are employed or even in a men's shed where there is public usage of machines.It's much easier and more effective to teach people how to work safely, rather than persuading them to fork out £Ks on every machine they are likely to encounter in their lives, and just ignore safe practices.
Enter your email address to join: