Right-wing populism = Fascism liteSOCIALISM = COMMUNISM LITE.
A bit like beer with the alcohol taken out
(Though I'm not sure how lite - it's still fermenting.)
Right-wing populism = Fascism liteSOCIALISM = COMMUNISM LITE.
A bit like beer with the alcohol taken out
Post #56 gives a very clear distinction.Perhaps you'd care to share your knowledge of the true nature of the two and the essential differences between them?
Clearly there are those among us, including yours truly, who are in need of some crumbs of enlightenment.
Just thought I would add, from an employer perspective and having worked in the US and UK, the US has a different cultural attitude to the UK and it can be quite difficult to adapt to if you start off in the UK (and even more so if you come from Norway or even France). The Marxist label is (I agree with Robin) just nonsense and I doubt that many Americans have a clue about Marxism.Post #56 gives a very clear distinction.
For example Kamala has called for paid leave for employees……in Europe that a basic right, it’s not crazy Marxist at all.
The problem is that neither of the ideologies (communism or socialism) work other than on paper. For them to work they need both coercion and the compliance of people who are unable to think beyond indoctrination and neither of the ideologies are desirable in a free thinking modern world.This is a half-decent summary for you:
'Key differences between communism and socialism
Under communism, there is no such thing as private property. All property is communally owned, and each person receives a portion based on what they need. A strong central government—the state—controls all aspects of economic production, and provides citizens with their basic necessities, including food, housing, medical care and education.
By contrast, under socialism, individuals can still own property. But industrial production, or the chief means of generating wealth, is communally owned and managed by a democratically elected government.
Another key difference in socialism versus communism is the means of achieving them. In communism, a violent revolution in which the workers rise up against the middle and upper classes is seen as an inevitable part of achieving a pure communist state. Socialism is a less rigid, more flexible ideology. Its adherents seek change and reform, but often insist on making these changes through democratic processes within the existing social and political structure, not overthrowing that structure.'
https://www.history.com/news/socialism-communism-differences
Communism seems to be absolutist (in practice, it isn't as it exists at the moment), while socialism exists within our economy as a force for change.
Both true!Right-wing populism = Fascism lite
(Though I'm not sure how lite - it's still fermenting.)
It would be nice if we got more woodworking achievements and projects as it helps give incentive and ideas to others, we all need a little push this time of year.I keep having to remind myself this is a wood forum.
Indeed. And I used to be very active in originating woodwork threads, tool reviews, projects etc and commenting on same here. But the shift in ownership to Republic of Panama domicile, coupled with an issue over termination and refund of supporter fees and what I regard as dodgy T&Cs at the same time, meant that I decided I would no longer originate any thread or post any images. This is because I regard Panama as a money laundering venue and legal concealment country.It would be nice if we got more woodworking achievements and projects as it helps give incentive and ideas to others, we all need a little push this time of year.
You could do your own research instead of lazily asking us help - you will only jeer at the answers!Perhaps you'd care to share your knowledge of the true nature of the two and the essential differences between them?
Yes I'm sure there are!Clearly there are those among us, including yours truly, who are in need of some crumbs of enlightenment.
The US was a socialist project from the start, following the French revolution closely and influenced by Thomas Paine and others.There are socialist principles at work in the US. Collectives for example, as seen in farming markets.
Right-wing populism = Fascism lite
(Though I'm not sure how lite - it's still fermenting.)
The relative inefficiency of collective farms led to the death by starvation of millions in the Soviet Union, not sure it's a great model.There are socialist principles at work in the US. Collectives for example, as seen in farming markets.
Jacob, you are absolutely nutsThe US was a socialist project from the start, following the French revolution closely and influenced by Thomas Paine and others.
The USA constitution is pure socialism, except for turning a blind eye to slavery - Washington and others were slave owners. And turned another blind eye to the extermination of the indigenous population - a.k.a "settler colonialism" (see Israel history).
The right to bear arms was included as a means of opposing an undemocratic government and was never intended to facilitate the random shooting of school children or black people.
Yeah...and when that didn't work, ole' Joe decided that a mandatory famine in Ukraine was the answer. About 10 million died. Lovely chap. Think he was a communist.The relative inefficiency of collective farms led to the death by starvation of millions in the Soviet Union, not sure it's a great model.
The relative inefficiency of collective farms led to the death by starvation of millions in the Soviet Union, not sure it's a great model.
USA workers take far less holiday per year than almost all of Europe, so not having mandated paid leave is unhealthy.Paid leave is really just a different distribution system. It's all part of the total payroll cost and the employer factors that into the whole business budget.
USA workers take far less holiday per year than almost all of Europe, so not having mandated paid leave is unhealthy.
You are in cloud cuckoo land and about as politically astute as a deckchair. No point in trying to debate with someone who doesn't realise what the Trump topic is.Starmer is an utter donkey and that is arguably being unkind to donkeys. He's gone to France to discuss the Trump topic???
He condoned the sending of 100 left wing activists to give support to what turned out to be the loser's presidential campaign, so why on earth would the winners see his actions as other than treacherous? That will no doubt come back to haunt Starmer and the British people at some point as I can't see the Americans trusting that silly person again.
Biden was a donkey too but not nearly as bad as Starmer.
You really couldn't make it up about Starmer, it gets worse by the day.. Only an absolute moron would have gone along with it and allowed it to happen in the first place for obvious reasons which could well be seen as electoral interference of a sovereign nation reminiscent of the communist agitation days and the left wing unions of the UK in the 60s & 70s.
You just wonder what he's going to do wrong next so please don't criticise his Tory predecessors, by Starmer's standards they were streets ahead and that doesn't say much about Starmer, that's for sure.
Maybe materialism, more often just sheer need, particularly for essentials such as housing purchase or rent.Absolute left wing nonsense.
It's materialism which puts people into debt. In today's society given the support of benefits etc, living beyond one's means is a lifestyle choice and not an essential.
Enter your email address to join: