Tony,
The rather poor office 'humour' is entirely aimed at some commonly preconceived stereotype whereas Baldrick is no stereotype of any person I have ever met or seen and thus I do not agree with your point.
So if I understand you correctly, you think that comedy based on commonly preconceived sterotypes is not funny but rather an attack on defenceless sections of society?
I'm sorry but I just don't believe you especially since while I agree Billy Connolly is a comic genius, he has built a career on parodying stereotypes. In particular the Glaswegian drunk - don't tell me thats not a stereotype of any person you have ever seen.
You also listed Little Britain - it is fundamentally based on parodying stereotypes - Vicky Pollard, The WI judges, Andy and his carer, Marjorie Dawes, Dafydd the only gay in the village etc etc.
League Of Gentlemen - not much different but indeed much harder hitting and tragic (but also very funny).
Vicar of Dibley - parody of female clergy but more obviously rural parish life.
But these are okay in your book?
I also think its telling that when I posted the list of David Brent comments in the joke thread, your reply was:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Who os David Brent?
_________________
Cheers
Tony
After telling you, you decide that those comments are no longer funny and then start a thread about how much you dislike The Office. So how does
that work? Rather inconsistent don't you think?
Tim
Who finds a lot of things funny irrespective of who says or does them