Jacob
What goes around comes around.
Don't be silly!So the answer for a peaceful solution is to reinstate the Turkish Empire?
Bring back their slavery too.
Don't be silly!So the answer for a peaceful solution is to reinstate the Turkish Empire?
Bring back their slavery too.
You're right. I was thinking of the Balfour Declaration of 1917.THE partition of Palestine was suggested by UNSCOP in August 1947 and was finally achieved by the UN General Assembly in November 1947. The UK had little or no involvement in the partition process beyond the Balfour declaration in 1917 and the mandate system in 1922 (that was ratified by the League of Nations). The continual assertion that all the problems in the Middle East were initially started by the UK is incorrect. The UK had a lot of input but the partition was achieved by agreement with many nations.
There is nothing written, thus far in this thread, that is anti-Semitic, but it is a claim made by those who want to shut down any criticism of Israel. I criticise the Israeli leadership for their indiscriminate killing of people and I criticise Hamas for the same thing but, in this latest conflict, I see Israel using the opportunity to wipe out, not only Hamas, but the people. Is history is repeating itself where the old victim is now the oppressor?No I don’t share your anti-Semitic views.
Of course it did not. It's perfectly clear in the quoted paragraph in the letter.The Balfour Declaration is very vague and I guess the Zionists believe it gives them permission to occupy all of Palestine.
There are no peaks on the data plotted by Dunning and Kruger. If you read their paper, Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments, you will find only four points plotted, and it doesn't represent any of the curves that I think you think represent the effect (it's also not a function) that you are thinking of.Those who are well-researched do not have to claim it. Please observe the left-hand peak in the Dunning-Kruger Function . . . .
From another time and place:The Balfour Declaration is very vague and I guess the Zionists believe it gives them permission to occupy all of Palestine.
View attachment 188468
"a UK government defined terrorist group" That would be the present Israeli government ?Geez, all the pussy cat footing around discussing a UK government defined terrorist group. What is all the ‘without taking sides’? To me it’s like saying your not taking sides discussing a convicted child molester, or the Nazis, there is only one morale stand point.
The curve function maps through the four points. Read the article carefully. Consider whether you are not yourself on the left-hand peak.There are no peaks on the data plotted by Dunning and Kruger. If you read their paper, Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments, you will find only four points plotted, and it doesn't represent any of the curves that I think you think represent the effect (it's also not a function) that you are thinking of.
The stated aims of Hamas and the Zionists means there's unlikely to ever be a happy ending. They want to destroy each other.
I tried to understand the history of the region after I noticed the mobilisation of so many Muslim women and children for the London marches. Why Gaza and not other genocides?
I found it impossible to unravel because the region changed hands so many times.
I did conclude that the Muslim protesters are mostly there because they want to reclaim Jerusalem and the Al Aqsa mosque which is the third most important site to them because of Mohammed's night time journey across the Middle East and a subsequent chat with Allah.
Making Jerusalem the capital city instead of Tel Aviv was also contentious.
See this:The stated aims of Hamas and the Zionists means there's unlikely to ever be a happy ending. They want to destroy each other.
I tried to understand the history of the region after I noticed the mobilisation of so many Muslim women and children for the London marches. Why Gaza and not other genocides?
I found it impossible to unravel because the region changed hands so many times.
I did conclude that the Muslim protesters are mostly there because they want to reclaim Jerusalem and the Al Aqsa mosque which is the third most important site to them because of Mohammed's night time journey across the Middle East and a subsequent chat with Allah.
Making Jerusalem the capital city instead of Tel Aviv was also contentious.
See this:The stated aims of Hamas and the Zionists means there's unlikely to ever be a happy ending. They want to destroy each other.
I tried to understand the history of the region after I noticed the mobilisation of so many Muslim women and children for the London marches. Why Gaza and not other genocides?
I found it impossible to unravel because the region changed hands so many times.
I did conclude that the Muslim protesters are mostly there because they want to reclaim Jerusalem and the Al Aqsa mosque which is the third most important site to them because of Mohammed's night time journey across the Middle East and a subsequent chat with Allah.
Making Jerusalem the capital city instead of Tel Aviv was also contentious.
I take you haven't read it. There are no peaks.The curve function maps through the four points. Read the article carefully. Consider whether you are not yourself on the left-hand peak.
Definitely a spanner.The curve represents a diachronic progress, with increasing knowledge.
This correspondence is no closed.
If the Israelis don't abide by the conventions of war, why should the Palestines?Hamas and Palestine does and has used children as weapons of war. There have been documented circumstances of babies being dressed in secure vests. For me, that puts into perspective children being shot. The perspective that children are all inoccent bystanders is simply not true. Unfortunately Hanas do not dress their terrorists in a uniform to allow them to be identified, anyone could be armed and dangerous.
https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-181056/
One of the main issues the world has had with the conflict has been the lack of aid, food medics etc allowed into Gaza. One of the main access points into Gaza is through Egypt, the Rafah gate has been the subject of much negotiation with both Egypt and Israel dragging their heels, equally Hamas haven’t exactly been cooperative. However, what I don’t see is Egypt equally accused of war crimes for blocking aid along with Isreal?
Not necessarily anti-zionist either. A zionist is just someone who wants Israel to exist at all. Some zionists are radical and fanatical, but being anti-zionist is to oppose the existence of Israel not to oppose just that subset.Not antisemitic; anti-Zionist. Kindly observe the difference.
Enter your email address to join: