As with ownership buy to let popularity may be the result of:
- collapse of final salary pensions and pension fraud have driven those who can to invest in property as a way to generate income in retirement, and protect their capital
- low interest rates and annuity rates have made buy to let an apparently cautious and rational option
- with life expectancy increases, property inherited by beneficiaries in their 50s or 60s who do not immediately need to sell.
IMHO it probably matters little as long as people have somewhere to live. Rental market may need some regulatory changes to give tenants better long term security, and landlords similar security of rental income.
If the goal is to make a homes (rented or owned) more affordable for the young the answer is simple. Build more houses. They will need to be where jobs exist so are likely to be in an area full of affluent nimbys wishing to protect their local environment.
This is in fact a big point, the failure of pension schemes and the closure of final salary schemes to new entrants at a point where an older person changing job might not be feasibly
able to put away enough money in a defined contribution scheme, was instrumental in creating the a demand for low risk, high return investments which kick started by to let.
That should never have been allowed to happen on such a large scale in the first place.
Do you want to earn more?
I wouldn't object to it, and a little extra would certainly make things much more comfortable.
However what would really have been desirable was not being screwed for very low pay (relative to qualification and responsibilities) when I was a younger man... Whilst at the same time facing higher outgoings than I do now.
So what I really want is to be able to look my junior colleagues and staff in the eye when a discussion about money comes up, and know that they're being fairly remunerated and aren't paying over the odds for their living costs.
Because "I've got mine" isn't a sentiment I can get behind, when I can see others in the same (or worse) situation I've been in historically
It‘s difficult times, I get that, but do you believe this is the only generation to face hard times?
No.
However, there's a good range of statistical information to show that on average a person under the age of 39, will be poorer in real term than their parents across most of their adult lives... (
OECD Report)
There's also a bunch of statistics to show that the cost of living is rising faster than wages for the 25-34 age group in particular (
FT Article ), which has some really negative impacts on people's behaviour and risk perception.
So your either deliberately or accidentally missing my point
I answered the question which you asked, no more no less.
what's stopping anybody from upping there earning potential from 35k to 150k? And the reason I don't do it is because I've done 80 hour weeks and all nighters before and have settled for the remuneration/effort comprise that I'm happy with
You know full well that it's entirely unrealistic that just anybody picked at random could make that kind of money...
However I'll humour you:
- Starting with employment:
- Not all people have now, or will ever have the skills or abilities to command a salary of £150k from their employer.
- There are laughably few posts which pay that kind of money compared to the number adults of working age in the UK, and of those that do pay that well, almost none which aren't as executive directors or working in the financial sector.
- Even amongst those who have the skills to do so, there's extreme competition for the small number of posts at that level, so some of it will come down to pure dumb luck as to why one equally well qualified candidate gets chosen over another.
- If we come to the idea of starting a business:
- Again not everyone has the skills and abilities needed to grow a business to the size where it will support a £150k director's salary,
- Even if they do, finding the start up capital is a major shortcoming for someone who isn't making a great deal of money to begin with
- If you're forced to go all in to your business just to have a shot and have no significant personal reserves of cash in case it doesn't work out, then the psychological stress is likely to make you perform less well and make less effective business decisions.
- Around 60% of small businesses fail with 3 years, which is a pretty terrifying level of risk to take on if you have family comittments... Not everyone is willing or even able to take those kinds of risks.