US Election November 5th

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd just love to see images of the critics on here who make fun of Trump's appearance. Seems the typical shallow MO of the left... they have to make the attack personal.
C'mon lads, don't be shy, post your images so that we can all have a gander at what YOU like and why you feel so emboldened as to ridicule the looks of others.
I would normally agree with you, except in Trumps case he has made more personal attacks on people's appearances and general existence than I've had hot dinners. The most recent of course questioning whether Kamala Harris is indeed black.

So he has forfeited any right to not be mocked in return.
 
Trump is not giving the disenfranchised a voice, because they're not disenfranchised; they can vote just like everyone else. What he is doing is playing on frustration and fear and offering "solutions" that won't, in fact, improve the conditions leading to that frustration and fear.

That's when he's not asserting that he won an election that he, in fact, lost, and otherwise lying.

I could rant on, but best I stop.
 
Trumps manifesto:
1) stop immigrants eating cats and dogs

2) stop abortions after birth

3) stop windmills that cause cancer

4) stop asylum seekers escaping from asylums

5) impose national abortion ban, or not depending which day of the week it is

6) concepts of a plan on something or other

7) give Ukraine to Putin.............because America first right


He could win bigly with such a great manifesto eh

You missed one …

8) Pardon himself for any past, current or future wrongdoing
 
Suppose China took it into their heads to ban the export of goods to the US. Would hurt them for sure, but the effect on the US economy would be immediate, and catastrophic
they did that last time when Trump started a trade war with China

"it appears China has stopped buying soybeans from the US altogether because of trade fight"

US farms are going bankrupt at an alarming rate. Trump’s trade war is partially to blame.​

More than 80 farms in the upper Midwest have recently filed for bankruptcy

Trump administration launched a $12 billion aid package for US farmers coping with retaliatory tariffs that foreign countries have imposed on their products.



 
they did that last time when Trump started a trade war with China

"it appears China has stopped buying soybeans from the US altogether because of trade fight"

US farms are going bankrupt at an alarming rate. Trump’s trade war is partially to blame.​

More than 80 farms in the upper Midwest have recently filed for bankruptcy

Trump administration launched a $12 billion aid package for US farmers coping with retaliatory tariffs that foreign countries have imposed on their products.



Exactly. The only way any country can afford to be isolationist is if it is entirely self sufficient, there can be very few of them.
 
I've just cast my vote.

In the polls on here, that is.


I do hope Harris is the next president, and voted as such in the poll, but no matter what the official result might be - I think we can quite safely predict that the orange jerkspangle will claim victory regardless. This is quite literally a frightening moment in world events, and an even more frightening moment in US domestic affairs. I don't think we can seriously rule out a nascent civil war - even if it doesn't develop into a full blown one.
 
main-qimg-1a7ebc27fb2413744c06b83e744c9d9e.png
 
As my mother used to say, "He's not all there...."

I think he's unstable. Totally irrational.
Childlike....and childish. Dangerous in many ways.
He'll again not accept the vote result if it happens to not go his way. Just as a child throws a tantrum.
I'm truly amazed that he's got so many "followers". He's a laughing stock, except it's not really funny.
I'm not really sure what it says about Yanks, common sense and values.

As I've said before, I don't think he's wired right.....
 
Tony a quick Google shows that Kamala Harris never said that.

It was a blog post that was falsely attributed to her.

“Social media users have been sharing posts that wrongly report Democratic vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris once said she did not like presidential candidate Joe Biden and called him “trash.”


The quote usedhere and here came from a blog post, not from Harris.

https://www.reuters.com/article/wor...-say-joe-biden-was-trash-to-me-idUSKBN26X20T/
 
Well if Harris loses to someone as bad as the left say Trump is, then what would it say about her?
The presidency is unquestionably hers to lose if that is the case.

My expectation based on the comments here would suggest that she will wipe the floor with Trump. If she only just scrapes through against someone allegedly as bad as Trump then she's just another Starmer.
 
Well if Harris loses to someone as bad as the left say Trump is, then what would it say about her?
The presidency is unquestionably hers to lose if that is the case.

My expectation based on the comments here would suggest that she will wipe the floor with Trump. If she only just scrapes through against someone allegedly as bad as Trump then she's just another Starmer.
You really are grasping at anything you can there aren't you?

PS another irony is that not only did she not make the comments about Biden that you posted, Vance (who's literally Trump's running mate) previously compared Trump to Hitler (https://www.reuters.com/world/us/jd...hitler-now-they-are-running-mates-2024-07-15/). But, no, something that Harris may or may not have said is much worse than someone likening you to Adolf🤦‍♂️
 
Well if Harris loses to someone as bad as the left say Trump is, then what would it say about her?
The presidency is unquestionably hers to lose if that is the case.

My expectation based on the comments here would suggest that she will wipe the floor with Trump. If she only just scrapes through against someone allegedly as bad as Trump then she's just another Starmer.
oh come on Tony, thats a deflection

when are you going to admit Kamala never said this:

 
It's what she's said historically that scares me because that's what will come through in her presidency if she gets it. Her messaging and positioning on issues has flip flopped throughout the entire campaign depending on who's she's talking and trying to appeal to. That tells me we would see something different. Furthermore she has thrown Biden under the bus several times and contradicted many things that were done during his time in order to appeal to voters all the time ignoring the fact she was second in command and a huge part of that government. The American population won't forget she was part of the last 4 years administration which anyway you paint it, have been a pretty terrible time for Americans.

As for her policies, her position on the border, her position on the economy and a clear Marxist leaning, her position on fast tracking illegal immigrants to a voting position in an attempt to secure future elections, her position on Christianity, the fact she's in bed with the WEF. Why do you think the media hate trump so much? Because he goes against the mainstream agenda. It's also why he has the support he has, Americans are sick and tired of big government. Big government being something the Brits relish on.
So you cant point to any policy in the presidential campaign the scares you?

Her messaging and positioning on issues has flip flopped throughout the entire campaign depending on who's she's talking and trying to appeal to.
Not that I can see, her messaging at rallies and in interviews has been pretty much consistent

Trump however has flip flopped on national abortion along with other things

her position on the border
seems quite robust to me

"During the September presidential debate, Harris emphasised her experience as Attorney General of California prosecuting cross-border crimes, such as drug trafficking and human trafficking, to distinguish herself from Trump. She also vowed to sign into law a proposal that a bipartisan group of Senators released in early 2024 before it failed due to Republican opposition. The bill would authorise hiring thousands more border patrol agents and asylum officers, allow the president to close the border if irregular border crossings reach a certain threshold, and raise the standard for being able to claim asylum, amongst other provisions. Harris has criticised Trump for urging Republican members of Congress to oppose the bill because he did not want to give Biden a victory on immigration during an election year.

If elected, she would likely continue to support US government efforts that she has been leading as vice president to increase public and private investments in Central America to address the root causes of migration. She would also likely continue the government’s work to create and expand legal avenues for immigration, such as refugee resettlement, work visas and parole, to reduce pressure on the US-Mexico border. She would also be expected to pursue enhanced migration management cooperation with other countries in the hemisphere by encouraging the other 21 signatories to implement the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection. Individually, none of these programmes or initiatives would be expected to reduce or alter migration flows immediately or significantly. However, when coupled with other policies, they serve as the building blocks for creating a more enduring migration management system that promotes safe, legal and orderly migration."

her position on the economy
specifically what?

and a clear Marxist leaning
please state what you mean as there is nothing remotely Marxist about the Democrat party


the fact she's in bed with the WEF
conspiracy theory and no true

her position on fast tracking illegal immigrants to a voting position in an attempt to secure future elections
thats a lie

her position on Christianity
is what?

Why do you think the media hate trump so much?
 
So you cant point to any policy in the presidential campaign the scares you?


Not that I can see, her messaging at rallies and in interviews has been pretty much consistent

Trump however has flip flopped on national abortion along with other things


seems quite robust to me

"During the September presidential debate, Harris emphasised her experience as Attorney General of California prosecuting cross-border crimes, such as drug trafficking and human trafficking, to distinguish herself from Trump. She also vowed to sign into law a proposal that a bipartisan group of Senators released in early 2024 before it failed due to Republican opposition. The bill would authorise hiring thousands more border patrol agents and asylum officers, allow the president to close the border if irregular border crossings reach a certain threshold, and raise the standard for being able to claim asylum, amongst other provisions. Harris has criticised Trump for urging Republican members of Congress to oppose the bill because he did not want to give Biden a victory on immigration during an election year.

If elected, she would likely continue to support US government efforts that she has been leading as vice president to increase public and private investments in Central America to address the root causes of migration. She would also likely continue the government’s work to create and expand legal avenues for immigration, such as refugee resettlement, work visas and parole, to reduce pressure on the US-Mexico border. She would also be expected to pursue enhanced migration management cooperation with other countries in the hemisphere by encouraging the other 21 signatories to implement the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection. Individually, none of these programmes or initiatives would be expected to reduce or alter migration flows immediately or significantly. However, when coupled with other policies, they serve as the building blocks for creating a more enduring migration management system that promotes safe, legal and orderly migration."


specifically what?


please state what you mean as there is nothing remotely Marxist about the Democrat party



conspiracy theory and no true


thats a lie


is what?
Since you are so unsure, would you like to provide evidence to the contrary of my points?

Crickets.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top