The Philippines disaster

[stevebuk]

its a shame this post has yet again come to the lets slag off Jacob thread, if most of you actually read what the chap wrote instead of just wanting a slanging match you may realise he has his opinions too, failing that i suggest you all put him on ignore like others have..

 

[Phil Pascoe]

We actually do read what Jacob writes, and we know he has his opinions too.

 

[markturner]

No one has "slagged him off""........

read carefully.... .....

if anything, he has been the one throwing the insults....let me see...moronic, bigot, ignorant, hypocrite are but a few of his personal attacks on me. It does not bother me but its pretty strange you cant see whats typed out in front of you.....

I simply pointed out the flaws in his student ranting......

 

[Jacob]

Thanks for that Steve. But it's OK I'm used to being slagged off.
Sometimes in threads like this I get the impression that some people have never heard opinions expressed much different from their own so it come as a bit of a shock to them, and anyway it's good practice for when I get down the pub!

 

[heatherw]

Your local must be a lively spot, Jacob, I must drop in next time I'm in Matlock Bath.

 

[riclepp]

its a shame this post has yet again come to the lets slag off Jacob thread, if most of you actually read what the chap wrote instead of just wanting a slanging match you may realise he has his opinions too, failing that i suggest you all put him on ignore like others have..

Alas Steve, Jacob is a maker of the percieved responses as usual, rather than having an intelligent and grown up two way conversation; Jacob always belittles everyones eles opions and thoughts for the betterment of his own ideals. If I remember there was a German who did that in the 20th Centry and just looked at what happened there.

Jacob, insists the we should be nice to one another and all live holding hands and sing Kumbyar around the camp fire which is fine and that is what he believes in (good luck to him on that one). But, as others have pointed out on numerous times in this thread, that won't happen as long as man draws breath; rather than saying "ok I respect your view point, could you explaine why you think that way" or something along those lines, he starts to belittle other peoples thoughts and dictate others. When people question his "Facts (Austrilia V's China) he starts to redicule them, rather than open adult dialouge, he resorts to scallding people for the benefit of his point. So yes, I do believe that other forum members do read his posts and take on board his opinions.

He did this on another forum to the point of almopst saying " he would wee on Lady Thatchers Grave" and he wonders why he got banned there. Rightly or wrongley she was someones mother, wife and Grandmother to someone. But his sentiments were the same there as he is now using on this forum.

I for one, do bite sometimes, as I believe he is only content when he creates chaos and poor dialouge, regardless of who it is. I also believe that he is a sad, lonley, pathetic old man. I do not think for one moment that he would say anything to someones face as he does on the net. That is my personal belief as he has not done anything to dispute that belief. So I don't think people are "slagging of Jacob par sey", just fed up whith his online attitude and lack of ability to have a rational conversation with out resorting to name calling and insulting people by using old fashioioned words, that people don't generally use in everyday conversation that are proberly not in true context of the conversation being had. I wonder if Jacob looks them up before putting them into the conversation????

Anyway Steve, that is my take on things, and yes you do have right to your own opinions, just like we all do.

 

[wizard]

i was talking to someone from the Philippines at the weekend and they were not the slightest bit bothered about it.

 

[Jacob]

Riclepp's post too long to answer in detail.
Riclepp you will just have to accept that on a public forum you will bump into opinions different from your own. That's the whole idea, you shouldn't be surprised.
What's this about peeing on maggie's grave - is there still a long queue? :lol:
Old fashioned words - do you mean "per capita"? It's Latin but quite commonly used. It means "per person" or literally "per head".

 

[markturner]

Oh lordy.......

Strange how you have nothing to say when someone demolishes your responses as the naive and childish opinions they really are....or comes back at you with a answer that simply disproves utterly something you just said....

I bet you are quite the big man holding forth at the bar in the pub.........it would be worth the trip just to see you in full swing. Second thoughts, I could get more sense from listening to my dog.......

 

[Jacob]

....someone demolishes your responses .......or comes back at you with a answer that simply disproves utterly something you just said.......

Er, can't say I noticed either of these things.

 

[riclepp]

Riclepp you will just have to accept that on a public forum you will bump into opinions different from your own. That's the whole idea, you shouldn't be surprised.

Perhaps you should look at this statement of yours and put it into practice then Jacob.


What's this about peeing on maggie's grave - is there still a long queue? :lol:

That is why you Mr Grimsdale got banned as people thought that was dis-respectful, outright offensive and you still have not learned fro it.


Old fashioned words - do you mean "per capita"? It's Latin but quite commonly used. It means "per person" or literally "per head".

No not per capita, I can't be bothered going through the post to copy and paste, as people can look for themselves and it is there in black and white.

 

[Jacob]

Riclepp you will just have to accept that on a public forum you will bump into opinions different from your own. That's the whole idea, you shouldn't be surprised.

Perhaps you should look at this statement of yours and put it into practice then Jacob.

What's this about peeing on maggie's grave - is there still a long queue? :lol:

That is why you Mr Grimsdale got banned as people thought that was dis-respectful, outright offensive and you still have not learned fro it.
....

News to me. I don't think I've ever been banned for being rude about Thatcher. Perhaps you don't realise that a lot of people don't hold Thatcher in high regard and see her (and neo liberalism etc) as a disaster. That's what I mean about different opinions - for some of us being dis-respectful of maggie is perfectly OK and all she deserves. You might ask yourself why - this is a forum and these things get discussed - that's the whole point!

 

[bugbear]

I don't think I've ever been banned for being rude about Thatcher.

Although various forums have banned you, in some case repeatedly having given you a second chance to behave.

Have you ever wondered why that is?

BugBear

 

[riclepp]

Riclepp you will just have to accept that on a public forum you will bump into opinions different from your own. That's the whole idea, you shouldn't be surprised.

Perhaps you should look at this statement of yours and put it into practice then Jacob.

What's this about peeing on maggie's grave - is there still a long queue? :lol:

That is why you Mr Grimsdale got banned as people thought that was dis-respectful, outright offensive and you still have not learned fro it.
....

News to me. I don't think I've ever been banned for being rude about Thatcher. Perhaps you don't realise that a lot of people don't hold Thatcher in high regard and see her (and neo liberalism etc) as a disaster. That's what I mean about different opinions - for some of us being dis-respectful of maggie is perfectly OK and all she deserves. You might ask yourself why - this is a forum and these things get discussed - that's the whole point!

I agree that is the point of a forum, however there is absolutly no need for insulting people, being crass or rude. Which I am sorry to say appears to be your deminor (to me anyway, as it would be wrong of me to suggest others think that way). And yes you did get banned from the Haven for extreme comments, insulting people and such like. Don't forget it is still in the public domain for all to see. So why dont you chill out and be more relaxed, and possibly more people will take less offence at what you say....just a thought..... :shock: :shock: :shock:

By the way I am not going to get drawn into a discussion about Maggie as that is not really what this thread is about is it. If I remember rightly it is about the Philipienes and I have said my bit on that..... :wink:

 

[Max Power]

" And yes you did get banned from the Haven "
:shock: Blimey Richard I thought you were referring to his no longer being welcome on woodwork uk.

 

[riclepp]

" And yes you did get banned from the Haven "
:shock: Blimey Richard I thought you were referring to his no longer being welcome on woodwork uk.

Oh dear that's not another one :shock: :shock:

 

[Jacob]

.....

Perhaps you should look at this statement of yours and put it into practice then Jacob.
......
That is why you Mr Grimsdale got banned as people thought that was dis-respectful, outright offensive and you still have not learned fro it.
....

News to me. I don't think I've ever been banned for being rude about Thatcher. Perhaps you don't realise that a lot of people don't hold Thatcher in high regard and see her (and neo liberalism etc) as a disaster. That's what I mean about different opinions - for some of us being dis-respectful of maggie is perfectly OK and all she deserves. You might ask yourself why - this is a forum and these things get discussed - that's the whole point!

I agree that is the point of a forum, however there is absolutly no need for insulting people, being crass or rude. Which I am sorry to say appears to be your deminor (to me anyway, as it would be wrong of me to suggest others think that way). And yes you did get banned from the Haven for extreme comments, insulting people and such like. Don't forget it is still in the public domain for all to see.

Er can I have a link?I don't remember any of this. As far as I recall it was about laughing at turners calling urns "hollow forms". I might have been rude about Prince charley but let face it who isn't? :lol: :lol:

So why dont you chill out and be more relaxed, and possibly more people will take less offence at what you say....just a thought..... :shock: :shock: :shock:

You aren't aware of how offensive some of the comments on this thread are, to me and possibly others. But anyway I'm not that bothered about people taking offence. I feel quite relaxed about it.

By the way I am not going to get drawn into a discussion about Maggie as that is not really what this thread is about is it. If I remember rightly it is about the Philipienes and I have said my bit on that..... :wink:

So why did you bring maggie into it? I certainly didn't. :shock: I try not to think about the crazy old bat!

 

[riclepp]

Jacob

Once I have posted this I am going to block you so I don't have to read anymore of your inept drivel. Without a shadow of doubt you are a complete and utter ****** whose sole purpose is to wind people up and knock one out as you get off on it. Years ago, in my Battalion when had a tosser just like you and boy did he get his comeuppance, plus a small spell in hospital, that is no less than what you deserve as you go out of your way to irritae people.

Have a good life you sad and pathetic old man!

 

[wizard]

Is it my imagination or has my post been hijacked

 

[riclepp]

Hi Wizard

Did try to get it back on track, but someone didn't want to get it back on track :?(