Steve Maskery
Established Member
Morning all
This is spin-off from Derek's thread over on Hand Tools.
First of all, sorry Derek, I didn't mean to hijack your thread! That's why I've started a new one. Nor did I mean to imply anything detracting about your SBs. I think they are beautiful, as is everything I've seen of yours. As I said before, I fully accept the notion that a ramped board spreads the wear on the blade and sole of the plane, but it's this issue of it producing a skewed cut that I have a problem with. I don't think it does and I hope that this explains why.
This is a normal shooting board shooting endgrain:
The blade is square on to the direction of travel and the angle of the blade will be 45 degrees.
If we ramp the workpiece 10 degrees it looks like this:
The blade is still 90 degrees to the direction of travel and the pitch of the blade is still 45 degrees - nothing is different about the cut. The position of the workpiece along the blade is slightly different, more of the blade will do some cutting, and at different times during the cut, but the cutting action itself is still 45 degrees EP, square on to the travel.
So we ramp a bit more, to 45 degrees:
Still the cutting action remains the same.
We can ramp as much as we like - 90 -
or even 110:
It's all essentially the same.
Now let us consider skewing the blade. This means the blade itself is not facing the direction of travel of the plane.
Skewed 10 degrees:
Skewed 45 degrees:
It should be clear now that the cutting angle is no longer 45 degrees, it is less than that (35.264 to be precise, and, I hope, accurate). This is why skewing produces a cleaner cut on end grain, it's because the cutting angle is effectively reduced.
To take it to extremes - skewed 90 degrees:
The EP is now zero, the plane is no longer cutting at all, I would just get a score line down the timber
and, ridiculously, 110:
in which case I'm actually dragging the plane backwards.
If anyone can tell me what is wrong with my logic, I'm quite prepared to be corrected, and I really hope I've not upset anyone with this, it is not my intention!
This is spin-off from Derek's thread over on Hand Tools.
First of all, sorry Derek, I didn't mean to hijack your thread! That's why I've started a new one. Nor did I mean to imply anything detracting about your SBs. I think they are beautiful, as is everything I've seen of yours. As I said before, I fully accept the notion that a ramped board spreads the wear on the blade and sole of the plane, but it's this issue of it producing a skewed cut that I have a problem with. I don't think it does and I hope that this explains why.
This is a normal shooting board shooting endgrain:
The blade is square on to the direction of travel and the angle of the blade will be 45 degrees.
If we ramp the workpiece 10 degrees it looks like this:
The blade is still 90 degrees to the direction of travel and the pitch of the blade is still 45 degrees - nothing is different about the cut. The position of the workpiece along the blade is slightly different, more of the blade will do some cutting, and at different times during the cut, but the cutting action itself is still 45 degrees EP, square on to the travel.
So we ramp a bit more, to 45 degrees:
Still the cutting action remains the same.
We can ramp as much as we like - 90 -
or even 110:
It's all essentially the same.
Now let us consider skewing the blade. This means the blade itself is not facing the direction of travel of the plane.
Skewed 10 degrees:
Skewed 45 degrees:
It should be clear now that the cutting angle is no longer 45 degrees, it is less than that (35.264 to be precise, and, I hope, accurate). This is why skewing produces a cleaner cut on end grain, it's because the cutting angle is effectively reduced.
To take it to extremes - skewed 90 degrees:
The EP is now zero, the plane is no longer cutting at all, I would just get a score line down the timber
and, ridiculously, 110:
in which case I'm actually dragging the plane backwards.
If anyone can tell me what is wrong with my logic, I'm quite prepared to be corrected, and I really hope I've not upset anyone with this, it is not my intention!