big soft moose
Established Member
- Joined
- 22 May 2008
- Messages
- 5,079
- Reaction score
- 0
Mike Garnham":2cvqjvw2 said:I used to be an aetheist until I realised that Richard Dawkins is god. I don't give two hoots about a Papal visit, nor who pays for it, but I do care that his words condem generations of Africans to more misery through Aids and over-large families.
Mike
Aetheist? Well, my daughter has labelled me an anti-theist, which I rather like. Isn't this thread running close to the "no religion, no politics" rule?
it is now
and i broadly agree with you about the HIV issue - though papal teachings arent entiely to blame for that problem, it is also a societal thing with lack of womens rights with the men choosing not to where condoms or be monogamous.
technically speaking, it isnt the papal no contraception edict that is the problem, because if they followed the papal line entirely they would also not have *** before or outside of marriage, and would be faithful and monogamous - the problem comes from the hypocrisy of insisting that you must folow the papal teaching on no condoms, but then also breaking them by having casual *** or visiting prostitutes.