The press, as always have a political narrative they wish to portray - and boy do they play it.
And as for the likes of Crisis and Shelter who don't actually provide any housing, what would you expect them to say?
You are quoting 2nd and 3rd hand information as if it were the gospel truth.
Shelter through its political lobbying has directly contributed to the reduction in available housing stock, whilst their directors again sit on 6 fig salaries.
Firstly averages (mean average is nonsense, use median instead, as this portrays a much more accurate picture).
Lets take a £200k house , 95% mortgage at 5% = £9,500 per annum or £791.67 PCM.
That does not seem much different to me than £900 per month rent, especially factoring in costs for maintenance.
So as the cost of finance has increased, the cost of ownership has increased and therefore the cost of rent. Add to this the activities of the left leaning so called conservative government we just got rid of, they further exacerbated the rise in rentals through punitive taxation on revenue not just profit.
In terms of immigration effecting housing stock, I can't see how anyone can say that an increase in population (from any source), doesn't correlate with an increase in the need for homes. Please explain this to me?
And as for the likes of Crisis and Shelter who don't actually provide any housing, what would you expect them to say?
You are quoting 2nd and 3rd hand information as if it were the gospel truth.
Shelter through its political lobbying has directly contributed to the reduction in available housing stock, whilst their directors again sit on 6 fig salaries.
Firstly averages (mean average is nonsense, use median instead, as this portrays a much more accurate picture).
Lets take a £200k house , 95% mortgage at 5% = £9,500 per annum or £791.67 PCM.
That does not seem much different to me than £900 per month rent, especially factoring in costs for maintenance.
So as the cost of finance has increased, the cost of ownership has increased and therefore the cost of rent. Add to this the activities of the left leaning so called conservative government we just got rid of, they further exacerbated the rise in rentals through punitive taxation on revenue not just profit.
In terms of immigration effecting housing stock, I can't see how anyone can say that an increase in population (from any source), doesn't correlate with an increase in the need for homes. Please explain this to me?