You are citing Epoch Times at me as vindication? ROFLMAO.
It's OK to be fooled, we all have been, best to try harder not be next time rather than getting more desperate not to admit it though.
PS outlets of bizarre religious cults are oddly enough not the best sources of truthful information.
Respectfully suggest you watch the video.
It shows official observers being told that counting was ceasing, and leaving. After they'd left, counting continued, and suitcases of ballots were taken out from under tables and counted.
Doesn't matter that it's the Epoch Times (which I've never heard of, by the way) reporting it. The video is the official video of the count.
Discounting evidence by rubbishing the source doesn't work in this case, as you'd see if you actually bothered to watch the video I linked to.
I'd also be grateful if you'd stop being insulting. There's no need for it. I've not been fooled - I said there is evidence of fraud, and I've posted one example. There are others, but I can't be bothered. You'd only find some reason to rubbish them, and I've got other things to do this evening.
It doesn't alter the fact that Biden will president on 20th January. However, just as the outgoing president's adherence to absolute truth was often tenuous, so is that of quite large elements of the mainstream media, who have been less than objective about Donald J. right from his nomination. When they say, "There is no evidence of election fraud", that's not strictly accurate. Whether that fraud was sufficient to affect the result is pretty doubtful, being patchy and sometimes inconclusive rather than widespread and systemic, but evidence there most definitely is.
Right. I'll leave you to it. Try not to insult me again, if you please.