Jester129
Established Member
So according to President Trump (part two), America won two world wars!!
Is our history different to that of P. Trump?
Is our history different to that of P. Trump?
Buckle up, the world is now set for four years of his claptrap, excepting a miracle or divine intervention.So according to President Trump (part two), America won two world wars!!
Is our history different to that of P. Trump?
According to Trump we’ve had divine intervention … God saved him so he could make America Great Again.Buckle up, the world is now set for four years of his claptrap, excepting a miracle or divine intervention.
Yes and the us made great profits for the lend lease of equipment not fully paid back until the noughtiesAnd anyone who thinks GB would have won WWII without massive US aid, equipment, planes, troops etc needs to study history.
Indeed. I remember being astonished when I read that the war debt to the US had finally been paid off. I'd naively assumed that it would've been written off years earlier, while America was booming and the UK were struggling.Yes and the us made great profits for the lend lease of equipment not fully paid back until the noughties
I'd imagine that very many people in the US and beyond are deeply scared this evening - those who testified against him, those whose sexuality doesn't conform to Trump's decree, those who've lived, worked and paid taxes in the US for decades and are now subject to deportation, those whose religion and race make them a target, those in Ukraine and elsewhere whose security is threatened by withdrawal of US support. Remains to be seen, but I'd say many of us should be feeling rather uneasy this evening.Travelling Keir will be wetting himself and Reeves of the fictional CV will be paying attention.
Well WW2 is much argued as without American supplies and or it's eventual involvement we were finished, equally you also have to give credit to the Russian forces fighting the eastern front.
I’m not sure it is a false argument.Supplies not sent freely. Paid for by us. We became indebted as a consequence. Our merchantmen (not US sailors) died in their thousands at the hands of Admiral Donitz's Wolf Packs.
The American Supplies argument is a false argument.
True about Russian casualties. Not to mention the thousands of Russians who were killed by fellow countrymen as well even after the war.I think I prefer Stalin's assessment of how the war was won. It's often imperfectly translated as "British brains, American brawn, and Russian blood."
The imperfection in the translation is American "brawn" - that is to be read as a reference to their industrial output as opposed to a quality of the troops.
British brains is often cited as Bletchley Park but he lacked a full understanding of that and has to be considered more broadly, e.g. radar, the SOE and even things like Mulberry for the D Day landings.
Russian blood is self explanatory, their body count was enormous, although it should be noted that military doctrine didn't put the same priority on preserving manpower. It seems to be a cultural thing, today Russian casualties vastly outnumber the Ukrainians in that conflict.
Most of which was already obsolete at the time, and much of which needed repairs before it could be used...Yes and the us made great profits for the lend lease of equipment not fully paid back until the noughties
So if the Americans had not been willing to supply us even as a debt then we would have been finished, we just did not have the production facilities they had. Yes it was a gamble because if we had been beaten then I doubt Hitler would have repaid the debt.The American Supplies argument is a false argument.