what was absolute? I've watched various personalities on forums for about 15 years as I've worked mostly in isolation, but I will test what people say and see if it works and compare in short time intervals (not long time in between) to see what's either more efficient or what actually gets results easier.
Jacob hasn't done much of what people like to talk about in this forum and finally leaked a year or so ago that he's only worked/planed a relatively small amount of wood by hand.
Nobody here has ever seen anything that would look like casework with tight joinery.
When people do come to the forums and do relatively good work, they seem to be transient - the discussion has no substance, and people are led to believe that the few on here who respond fast, often and idealistically really know what they're talking about. I don't think they do.
In this case, the recommendation to stick with junk chisels. If a $200 set of chisels is somehow a waste of money, what will happen when one wants to buy wood good enough for hand tool work? It really doesn't make any sense. Some experience trying to make things with bad wood (starting from rough) will illuminate the last statement, because I'm sure the next boast coming from somewhere will be never having to buy higher cost wood from a good supplier.
it's not a hobby where you can buy competence, and it's also not a hobby where putting the odds against you will get you anywhere.
The opposite end of the spectrum from where jacob preaches from is also there - more than one source for it, but this is as big of an offender as I can recall:
https://bluesprucetoolworks.com/collections/chisels/products/butt-chisel-1-1-000-25-4mm
there's a whole page of comparable "tools" that look like they were designed by someone who never really ventured into comparing to vintage tools and understanding why they were made the way they were made. Appalling.
Tibi is in a place where you can't just find good older English chisels, otherwise, I would recommend he go that way, but not buy trash.