Against_The_Grain
Established Member
I've never seen one like it anywhere.
Then perhaps you should cut one out and try it instead of decrying it vehemently with no real experience, it's been the industry standard in wood machining for decades.
I've never seen one like it anywhere.
Probably not entirely true.Funny thing is by the time the brain has registered to quickly pull back your hand, the accident has already happened and the damage been done.
Worked out in college once. Think about the fastest you could touch something, and pull away. 1/10 of a second ?
So look at the speed of a planer block ,well say 5000 rpm. so in one second dividing 5000 by 60 =83.3 rps. finger comes into contact with cutter block for 10th of a second, so divide 83 by 10 giving us say 8. Now as there are 2 blades, that number is multiplied by 2 giving us about 16
So in that single quickest you can do the touch, the blades have taken 16 slices from your finger tip.
Pretty much yeah ,you'd be down to the knuckle.Probably not entirely true.
…I imagine there’s no finger left to slice after about 5 or 6
Then perhaps you should cut one out and try it instead of decrying it vehemently with no real experience, it's been the industry standard in wood machining for decades.
Have tried lots of variationsThen perhaps you should cut one out and try it
Have quite a lot of experienceinstead of decrying it vehemently with no real experience,
News to me. Is there an industry standard? How come nobody copies it in plastic or supplies anything like it with machines etc?it's been the industry standard in wood machining for decades.
In the real world, you need a variety of different shapes for whatever you might be cutting, and even a push stick in the right hand and a push stick with a steel spike in the end for control in the left hand is ideal for a lot of work.
Pretty much yeah ,you'd be down to the knuckle.
While scrounging scrap timber off a big cabinetmakers bitd, i was talking to the bloke who sweeps up. He was a cabinetmaker and had fed one hand into the surfacer losing all 4 fingers by half. The company kept him on to sweep up but he couldnt work at anything else because of the damage done.
it might transfer enough energy to throw your hand clear of the blade and into the fence leaving a red mark.
I’ve recently started watching a YouTube channel for ‘sawyer design’ and he makes some nice stuff, but he has some of the most sketchy practices and he almost celebrates it. He started a catchphrase of “not your fingers, not your problem” and has been trying to sell T-shirts on it.
It baffles me how ignorant some people are to the danger they are in.
Like I get how a sawstop could breed complacently with a table saw in America, but in one video he pushes a tiny piece over the planer with his bare hands. He also does a lot of sketchy cuts on the table saw, but he has a Harvey rather than a sawstop. It’s a matter of time before they aren’t his fingers either i guess, and just like your guy, I imagine that will end his (YouTube) career
Ah, so you have also worked in woodworking factories pushing thousands of metres of timber through various machines on a day to day basis? If you had, you would’ve seen this style of push stick on practically every machine, you even see that particular design in old training manuals.Have quite a lot of experience
Ah, so you have also worked in woodworking factories pushing thousands of metres of timber through various machines on a day to day basis? If you had, you would’ve seen this style of push stick on practically every machine, you even see that particular design in old training manuals.
As said, it doesn’t serve every purpose but it does cope with most work perfectly fine whilst achieving its main objective which is to reduce the risk of an operator coming into contact with something sharp and fast.
Check the thickness of the riving knife and the blade. If the blade is thinner than the knife it will bind. In use this appears to the eye as a mis-aligned knife or fence. Check the knife is not bent. I don't know your saw, but usually you can fit shims into the fastening box for the knife to move it sideways or align it with the blade. It is a safety risk. Apologies if I'm teaching my grandmother to suck eggs.Thanks for sharing your experiences. Since I started using my table saw last year I have always endeavoured to treat the saw with the greatest respect. This is a sobering reminder for me not to allow any complacency to creep in. The HSE guidance appears to cover all the key basics and a good starting point. A key point I think is always carry out a mental 'risk assessment' before making cuts.
On a slightly tangential issue wrt safety on the table saw I have a slight issue with my saw. When I first got it I was mainly doing cross cuts. More recently I started to do some rip cuts and found the timber was binding on the rip fence on the final push out. This caused me to recheck all the alignments. After a a few tweaks I was confident I had the blade and fence correctly aligned and parallel, at least to a few 100th's of a mm. This improved things however I still felt the timber binding on the run out. I then found that the riving knife was toeing out from the blade, effectively pushing the cut timber towards the fence. I checked this by passing a cut piece back through. The work piece was free running between the blade and fence up until the piece gets to the riving knife. At this point you can see the work piece starting to deflect the knife and then spring back once it passes right through, I would say about a mm. I can see no way of adjusting the riving knife independently.
I would very much like to hear any thoughts from the more experienced members on this. I.E. is this normal. a safety risk etc. Obviously even more wary now.
The table saw is a Charnwood W629.
That accounts for the very high accident rates then.Ah, so you have also worked in woodworking factories pushing thousands of metres of timber through various machines on a day to day basis? If you had, you would’ve seen this style of push stick on practically every machine, you even see that particular design in old training manuals.
.....
yeah that was the part where my brain had to do a check and work out whether I was missing something, after the withdrawal.Funny thing is by the time the brain has registered to quickly pull back your hand, the accident has already happened and the damage been done.
Worked out in college once. Think about the fastest you could touch something, and pull away. 1/10 of a second ?
So look at the speed of a planer block ,well say 5000 rpm. so in one second dividing 5000 by 60 =83.3 rps. finger comes into contact with cutter block for 10th of a second, so divide 83 by 10 giving us say 8. Now as there are 2 blades, that number is multiplied by 2 giving us about 16
So in that single quickest you can do the touch, the blades have taken 16 slices from your finger tip.
Some cheapo plastic ones may shatter though I've never seen it happen, but they don't as a rule. They just get nicked and cut quite safely..... I also avoid the plastic ones because they can shatter.
"Pushing 1000's m's etc". come on be fair, feeding that much its one after the other with the next component pushing the one in front and in industry they tend to favour power feeds.
That's pretty much the case - I dipped the tip of my left ring finger into my surface planer - complacency is most likely reason as the piece of timber was quite thick and didn't really require push sticks however I'd inadvertently let that finger dangle as I guided the wood through, and possibly I also could have set the fence closer to minimise the amount of exposed blade.Probably not entirely true.
…I imagine there’s no finger left to slice after about 5 or 6
Er - hate to say it but obviously it did require push sticks!That's pretty much the case - I dipped the tip of my left ring finger into my surface planer - complacency is most likely reason as the piece of timber was quite thick and didn't really require push sticks
Enter your email address to join: