As I expect you all know for many years I have be a keen 'Rat user and have run a website with a lot of WoodRat related material, tips and jigs.
Some of those jigs have been to make the machine work a little better.
I have been frustrated that WoodRat did not appear to act upon any of it's customer feed back ideas.
The Router Boss was borne from the wish to make a good machine better.
It is highly unlikely that any remaining ( if any) WoodRat patents have been violated as nobody actively seeks court action.
Table saws, bandsaws etc. etc all have their clones and variations so why should it be different with the 'Rat/RB? Top quality costs top money.
The RB is engineered to a much higher degree and as a consequence is likely to cost more than the 'Rat. So you can pay your money and take your choice. The RB is both engineered and dimensionally different to the WoodRat so I doubt if there will be much crossover of parts.
Router Boss are taking feedback from the new owners and are acting quickly to update and revise anything that need to be done.
There are many forum members here that take pride in owning the highest quality tools and machinery when in truth basic stuff can be sufficient. We all aspire to owning the best we can afford and competition can only be good for us surely?
One new RB owner has sent me his first impressions/ comparisons and I have posted that report here
http://www.aldel.co.uk/RB2.htm
There is no doubt that Martin Godfrey should take all credit and recognition for his initial ideas and design but after several years the concept is now being built upon and improved.
Aldel
Aldel