Also bear in mind that a new Part 1 valve to replace the existing will not have or accept the silencer tube the the original is showing as there will be no thread in the outlet to accept it.
I’m possibly wrong on this but did the water police not outlaw those tube’s because they could siphon the water from the cisterns in the event the water company shut the main off in the road and those blue dyes were put in the cistern to clean the loo would contaminate the main when the water supply was restored, about the same time they brought out outside garden taps with built in nonAlso bear in mind that a new Part 1 valve to replace the existing will not have or accept the silencer tube the the original is showing as there will be no thread in the outlet to accept it.
Exactly that.This is ok for a temporary fix but it won’t last , as the other side of the washer wears it will breakdown completely as the rubber perishes. No disrespect but Op does not have much in the way of plumbing knowledge or he wouldn’t have made the post to begin with. He won’t know if it’s the washer or the orifice or both that’s at fault- hence the advice to change the majority valve - there is less chance of him making a mistake imo.
It might be of such an age that all the parts are brass, there was a time before polymers like plastic !I've fixed have had degradation to the plastic vale end
the orifice is plastic and does not wear like the old brass ones, and easy enough to check anyway.This is ok for a temporary fix but it won’t last , as the other side of the washer wears it will breakdown completely as the rubber perishes. No disrespect but Op does not have much in the way of plumbing knowledge or he wouldn’t have made the post to begin with. He won’t know if it’s the washer or the orifice or both that’s at fault- hence the advice to change the majority valve - there is less chance of him making a mistake imo.
Really? I have changed more worn plastic ones than I have ever changed brass ones.the orifice is plastic and does not wear like the old brass ones, and easy enough to check anyway.
Good on you and yes we all learn as we go. Saving money is the way forward but only if it makes sense in the long run . Sometimes you have to bite the bullet and spend more but then the job is done correctly and doesn’t require multiple re - fixes that inevitably cost more .The job is all done, thanks. I fitted a complete new ballcock. Total cost to the charity was £11.22 for parts, instead of the £300 that the charity group leader had said they had been advised would be the going rate for a professional.
re Bingy man's comment, he is right. My plumbing knowledge is nowhere near that of a professional, but I learn a bit more each time I complete a job and it saves a lot of money. Times are harder now. Even the Bank of England says we have to get used to being poorer!
Bank of England economist says people need to accept they are poorer
Good on you and yes we all learn as we go. Saving money is the way forward but only if it makes sense in the long run . Sometimes you have to bite the bullet and spend more but then the job is done correctly and doesn’t require multiple re - fixes that inevitably cost more .
Same here, in 25 years of business filled by 8 years retirement so far and I've had a series of houses, some pretty old since 1970.Really? I have changed more worn plastic ones than I have ever changed brass ones.
Enter your email address to join: