Will this do?
Let me know which number you want to go for.
It’s even one of your lefty hangouts ‘Novara Media’
...and that's a staggeringly well thought out and reasoned rebuttal to my statement; for which I must concede you're right. Your debating skills are truly matched by your ability to process evidence....and that isn't me!
Increase the subsidy of childcare???? For goodness sake next we'll be paying chavs to have kids. There's far too much by way of subsidies for parents. I don't know how they would have managed when I was young and breeding with a WIFE!the solution is
A) tax wealth the same as income
B) increase taxes on the wealthy
C) reduce private ownership and create more public ownership
D) bring contracts back in house.....council are doing this
E) a mass council house building programme
F) increase opportunities for people by education
G) increase subsidy of childcare
but the real way to transform this country is to regulate the press properly so that billionaire owners of the Daily Mail ands Telegraph are no longer able to manipulate the general public
Apparently everything is aspirational with Starmer...I suppose identifying as a worker is aspirational too?no he didnt
Starmer made 10 pledges as part of his leadership campaign and all it said in pledge no 2 no social justice was
"Support the abolition of tuition fees and invest in lifelong learning."
Its an aspiration, nothing else and it was before the economic damage of covid and costof living crisis
Just out of interest, where is this business of yours? Website? You seem very proud of it!Anyway I'll take it you've never built a business
No we’re talking about Starmer being a rotten liar. I’ve shown you evidence, you denied it’s viability (i think that was option 3).
Here have some more
you lived in a period when wealth inequality was lower TonyIncrease the subsidy of childcare???? For goodness sake next we'll be paying chavs to have kids. There's far too much by way of subsidies for parents. I don't know how they would have managed when I was young and breeding with a WIFE!
Tony this is yet another of your uninformed opinions not backed up with factsThere's far too much by way of subsidies for parents
Segueing from some of our posters who love saying stuff because they believe it (rather than it having any basis in fact)... to the next POTUS... who loves saying stuff because he believes it (rather than it having any basis in fact)... here's a good piece on Trump's proposed tariffs:
Tariffs Will Aggravate Trumpers?It's a pity that can't be reduced to a three or four word summary for trump supporters. Or, even better, a four letter acronym.
the thread is called "Trumps top team"
why are you so scared about discussing Trumps impending tariff war
Delaney said: "Trump’s view on the economy...........is a better direction for the US
Shall we all presume that you no longer agree with that position?
come on, do you think tariff increases will be good for America or not?
I just removed the non applicable partHave you taken two different sentences and attempted to connect them using ………..?
Robin you do talk some unadulterated left wing bo**ox! Wealth inequality has always existed and always will. Blaming lack of success on wealth inequality is just an excuse for justifying failure to achieve.you lived in a period when wealth inequality was lower Tony
thank you for proving my point
and by the way it is not simply chavs putting off having children.
Couples put off starting a family because they can’t afford homes
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lon...-because-they-can-t-afford-homes-8216110.html
Tony this is yet another of your uninformed opinions not backed up with facts
Tony may I ask are any of your opinions based on fact?
by the way, subsidised childcare can actively help the economy, here is research and policies in Canada
https://hechingerreport.org/what-america-can-learn-from-canadas-new-10-a-day-child-care-system/
one day Tony you might learn something.............that would be good for you eh
That’s not relevant.Wealth inequality has always existed and always will
Tony please can you explain why you are blaming people for the following:Blaming lack of success on wealth inequality is just an excuse for justifying failure to achieve
Enter your email address to join: