trousers":1x90sk18 said:
I'm finding it hard to take you seriously Trig.
Mike is a truly helpful bloke and I'm very suprised that he's stayed with this thread as long as he has.
I'm aware that Mike is very knowledgable and helpful, he was trying to help me with this a couple of weeks ago, and I understand that you are also very helpful to people on this site. I am quite shocked by your reply and don't understand where this mistrust has come from (on the 5th page of this I made one light-hearted comment to Mike, that's all).
I just feel there's some background here which you're not telling us.
No there isn't. I am a bit offended that you are assuming I am lying, which I am not, but I do appreciate that a lot of nonsense gets splashed around the internet, and that you don't know that this isn't an example of that, so I'll try not to be too offended.
For example, what did your "architect" specify for damp proofing measures on this build, especially wrt the problem that has so far lasted 5 pages here?
The problem has lasted 5 pages because as Mike said, it's not necessarily an easy one to fix. I built what my architect specified, and building regs signed the plans off.
If it's a problem to you, your first port of call should be to the "professional" you paid to specify this lot in the first place. And although you apparently did ask "some time back" nothing seems to have come of it. So have your "professionals" given you the elbow, or is it the reverse?
Until posting on this thread I wasn't aware that their was a problem with the guest house part of the build (ie, it is totally dry etc). I also didn't believe that the problem with the workshop was that bad. I thought it was damp and needed fixing, and I thought I might get better ideas on here on how to fix it than my architect would have. So I've only spoken to the architect about the problem with the shed (I didn't ask them to design it as a workshop) and they suggested I could put Vandex or similar on the inside of the wall. I've since discussed rendering the top 3 feet and catching the water that drips off which they think is a good idea.
When designing the build I think my architect:
a) wanted to get me building regs approval
b) didn't care about my shed (I didn't ask them to) - although they specified a dpc for the shed, they didn't specify dpm (and when I say specify, I mean to get building regs approval, not that they recommended I didn't put in a dpm).
c) assumed I was more bothered about getting the maximum width from my shed than it being completely dry (I am bothered about the width, but had no idea the single skin wall would be so damp)
d) may have thought that the gap between the walls would not have been filled with concrete, and may have drained better.
The more I read it, the more I think there was no architect in the first place, and now you've got a problem you've come to a woodworking forum to help you out for free.
If I didn't have an architect I would have no problems asking the helpful people of this forum for free advice. I do have an architect, and I still think it's a good idea asking for some advice with my problem. My problem isn't that dis-similar to Dibs's workshop, where he built very close to a dry stone wall, and you recommended a product for him coat on his walls.
So if I'm wrong you can tell us all why you really went ahead with a scheme which anybody on this forum could have told you was going to be trouble, let alone an architect.
I'll send you a pm.