The thing is, it is essentially impossible to gather any views and therefore make any money on YouTube without using clickbaits. Misleading and dramatic titles and thumbnails, revealing clothing, whatever.
Veritasium, an hard science channel, once made a video demonstrating with figures and a/b testing how regretfully it had become impossible to them to gain any meaningful reach unless they used thumbnails and eye catching titles not in line with the factual and measured content of their videos.
In the end, the bulk of views and any meagre income come from entertainment.
The majority of Sellers's views presumably come from people fascinated with his calm demeanor, his skills and determination to use hand tools. Not necessarily from people doing actual woodwork.
Similarly, most viewers of the lady in question were initially, or permanently, attracted by her looks.
They still do woodwork though, for which there are few buyers, so to speak, and selling is always about the buyer, not the seller.
I have great admiration for the integrity of people choosing to do otherwise, but they gather ridiculously low views and cannot typically make a living out of it.
So I do not condemn those who instead chase the algorithm, if their work is decent, because otherwise nobody truly interested would ever get a chance to see it.
But it is nothing new, isn't it?
How many artists had to resort to skimpy clothing or headline grabbing behaviours before the internet, even if they were really good at their craft?