Newbie_Neil
Established Member
Hi Randy
Welcome to the forum.
Cheers
Neil
Welcome to the forum.
Cheers
Neil
Whereas I was never good enough to get paid... :roll: :lol: I assumed Lie Nelson was the chap who wisely turned a blind eye to chisel criticism. :wink:MikeW":1f8bocfg said:And to think I use to get paid to proof read!David C":1f8bocfg said:Could some kind person please correct the spelling of the title of this thread?
Philly":3ep3k8em said:LN
They are a fantastic chisel and beautifully built. You will not be disappointed!
At this exchange rate you know it makes sense :lol:
I'll buy them off you if you don't like them :wink:
Philly
Mr_Grimsdale":1o63hr3w said:Yes give em a bell if you really want some crumbly chisels a bit cheaper.
cheers
Jacob
Mr_Grimsdale":2fy8m1oi said:Yes give em a bell if you really want some crumbly chisels a bit cheaper.
It's simple then. And it sounds like you have initiated the proper response--send them back.Bean":2n6j9ijd said:Look folks its very simple really,
LN advertise their chisels as being of a certain hardness, not as being of two quite different hardness's, the softer being the one at the working edge. The chisel is not to the advertised specification. It may be heresy to some, but it is a 'duffer' plain and simple.
As for grinding the edge away to expose good steel, that wreaks of poor production qualities,...
...Even the best manufactures get one wrong now and then, and the only way to get them to change/clean up their act is to complain.
On that note I have received no reply from LN, which I will put down to the weekend. As and when I get a reply I will let you know.
Seeing how only three people here on the UK Forum have received what *may* be construed as "free" tools as far as I know, I find that statement contentious and ill spoken. You are basically saying their allegiance to those makers is bought and paid for. Pity you belive that.Unlike some on this forum I do not receive free tools from these manufacturers, hence I do not have to defend them...
Well it kinda depends on why it's happening, which is why I asked. If it's something that happens regularly enough, then perhaps they should. Or make it clear it's a possible issue in the accompanying information. On the other hand if it's a rare occurance then yeah, you have a duffer and it should go back. I'd still like to know how big a part the abnormally hard and abrasive woods you've tried them on is playing in the results you've seen though, but I guess it's only us acquirers of "free" tools who take the trouble to try out things and report back for the benefit of others.Bean":2d1ow9db said:As for grinding the edge away to expose good steel, that wreaks of poor production qualities, if that extra grinding is required to produce a good edge on this tool, why is it not done in the factory.
I think Bean is voicing a lot of opinion I'd sooner do without, but what I believe he's saying is that he expects the chisels to work on abnormal woods without making allowance for the characteristics of the tool and the method of manufacture. What the "fan base" are saying is that's possibly an unreasonable expectation. But unless he tries the options we don't know if it's a legitimate argument or that he has, in fact, got a rubbish example. In which case we'll all get accused of being over-enthusiastic fans again when we say "no problem then, LN will take them back". As Bean is apparently desiring more than these chisels in their present state can provide and is unwilling to steepen the bevel to see if that's an improvement or try them on less forbidding woods, it's best all round if he gets his money back and I look forward to hearing of the out-of-the-box perfection of whatever he gets as an alternative so we all know what to recommend instead.Mr_Grimsdale":2d1ow9db said:I think Bean is voicing an opinion that is shared by many on this forum, that LN are somewhat over promoted. That they are the best, always perfect and instantly useable, and that everything else is rubbish.
backs up my earlier posts. If, as and when LN contact me regarding this chisel, and either replace it with a good one or refund my money I will be happy. I will however not allow my allegence to a company stop me from believing that they can, will and do produce 'duffers' from time to time.I think Bean is voicing a lot of opinion I'd sooner do without
Okay, lets' spell this one out for you. The opinion I'd sooner do without is this (now repeated) half-pineappled claim that I have some sort of allegiance to Lie-Nielsen. I do not. I never have had. All opinions I've ever expressed on forums concerning LN tools have been based exclusively on tools I have either bought, been given as gifts by family or have been loaned for the short duration of a review. Even if that was not the case, I suggest you stop judging others by your own evidentally low standards.Bean":1hb5nxa4 said:Alf your comment ofbacks up my earlier posts. If, as and when LN contact me regarding this chisel, and either replace it with a good one or refund my money I will be happy. I will however not allow my allegence to a company stop me from believing that they can, will and do produce 'duffers' from time to time.I think Bean is voicing a lot of opinion I'd sooner do without
Mr_Grimsdale":gp8kdhkg said:They have only themselves to blame for their pushy and complacent marketing.
Bean":210n06qq said:Who would have thought a duff chisel would cause so much excitement. :wink:
I agree with David C's comment on the need for fine tools and the alarming and appalling quality tools produced by some 'quality' toolmakers.
Enter your email address to join: