Gotten

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Come on chaps... How come no one's stepped in to say that it's ok to start with a preposition....
It's ending a sentence with a preposition that's frowned upon.
Winston Churchill is reputed to have said " that's the sort of behaviour up with which I will not put".
 
Who or whom? I just wrote this elsewhere - She'd worked there for thirty years so I expect they knew who she was.
It probably should be whom, but whom just looks wrong.
No, I think that sentence was right...it works with 'who' but wouldn't work with 'whom'. It not only looks wrong, it sounds wrong too.
 
My tuppence with the benefit of an Oxford first in English and 25 years as a professional writer and editor (and a certain amount of joy that after a quarter of a century I can cite it): FWIW, probably sweet FA, communication is the point and the best thing about English is how and how much it changes. People often worry about correctness and very seldom consider fun.

I wrote a whole essay in undergraduate finals about words like "gamahuching" and had a very enjoyable exploration of notions of the obscene in doing so; that word isn't used any more, which is a shame as it's a lot of fun to say, but only because of that am I able to gain so much joy from discovering it. English has more words than any other language, many times the amount you can use in French or German, at least partly because rather than trying to safeguard and ossify itself like French does, it happily steals language from elsewhere and moves on, with a je ne sais quoi that makes it fun to play with.

Any prejudice against neologisms like "gotten" (which I also really strongly dislike) is fine, but has to be recognised for what it is, which is tribalism about certain ways of writing and speaking. Because you're allowed to do almost whatever you like with English (certain technical fields excepted for which precision is important), and its nature means very few rules remain constantly applicable – look at the spelling vs the phonetics and figure out how the spoken word "fish" could arguably be written "ghoti." Then get on a forum and spend hours arguing about it with strangers, but take a moment to recognise that you're enjoying yourself as you do, and you wouldn't be able to do that if there really was a proper binding Right and Wrong to worry about.
Well, I want youy're sniffing...
 
Who or whom? I just wrote this elsewhere - She'd worked there for thirty years so I expect they knew who she was.
It probably should be whom, but whom just looks wrong.
I think it has to be "who" because of "she".
If the pronoun was "her" (which obviously doesn't work here), then it would be "whom".
 
I wonder if any language pedant, ever wrote a good book. Except, maybe one on grammar and punctuation. :giggle:
 
Bill Bryson’s a bit of a stickler for language.
It's not really essential to the meaning. If you wrote "to who shall I send the subscription" you'd still be understood, even though you'd started a sentence with a preposition...
Yes. I’d go further, and say “who shall I write the prescription to?” There’s no particular reason not to end with a preposition. I think the rule came from some bloke’s book on English usage a very long time ago.

“Who shall I write the prescription to? What’s it for?”

Versus

“To whom shall I write the prescription? For what is it?”
^ Sounds a bit Yoda, to me.
 
The problem for me with whom in phrasing such as 'To whom shall I write the prescription', or 'To whom shall I send the subscription' is that whoever said it or wrote it maybe appears a bit up themselves and pretentious. I don't care if whom is the right word in such a sentence, but I do care if you come across as an admirably ignorable supercilious leg-end, if you get my drift. Slainte.
 
Much more natural to ask - who should I send the subscription to. And the preposition rule can the pineapple get to.
 
I think the rule came from some bloke’s book on English usage a very long time ago.
From what I've read learned scholars several hundred years ago decided that the standard of English was going downhill and need re Latinising. I suspect it came from pedants using Latin as a starting point - the preposition isn't a seperate word in Latin. Just the same as split infinite - we mustn't split infinitives in English simply because the Latin infinitive can't be split.
 
I read a letter in The Times some years ago from a chap who ran a business that needed very precise translations in its documents (he didn't say which field he was in). He preferred to employ Polish and Hungarian English graduates as their written English was better than any of British English graduates he'd employed.
 
@paulrbarnard as a fellow dyslexic I find it quite fascinating to spell.

I have also found trying to learn a different language that it's ex English teachers that are pedantic to the extreme about conjugating verbs, most people just want to communicate effectively in other languages, the native speakers don't seem to mind if you split an infinitive or refer to an object as male or female, I suppose now days you can use the excuse that the object now identifies differently from its perceived original gender. 😱
 

Latest posts

Back
Top