Jake":3fcdg3vv said:Possibly over zealous one-eyed lawyering - effective clause from a narrow point of view, but a bad wider outcome for the client. It could also be "lazy clienting" by Google.
Very possibly, I'm thinking that it's boilerplate, identical to the licensing for the google docs et al etc suggesting that it was just stuck in, in a "this is our standard license" fashion.
Cheers Mike