I see it as a race.
We all know that when a device is new, it works well. As software updates are added it becomes slower and slower to the point of being unusable.
The counter point is that without updates, especially, the web browser won't keep up with new technologies being used on websites and after a few years you won't be able to use some sites. A "few" is typically from 5 years onwards.
I'd rather have a device that works quickly and reliably until that point of obsolescence, but Apple and microsoft have both taken that choice away from me on their computers. They try to force software updates, which effectively make my hardware
and software obsolete every few years whatever use I actually put my devices to.
As a mac user since the 80's (phone ipads laptops desktops) this has finally annoyed me enough to call time on apple. I no longer need the machines for work and I've stopped buying their products.
I now have a windows PC that runs as fast as when I set it up because I've learnt how to block the daily windows update requests and have done so for nearly 2 years. I have my first Android phone and it works well enough that I don't regret changing. I try to be very selective about the apps that I add to it.
The one and only app that I really miss from the move to Android is the superb "Pocket Earth". A little utility that lets you download "open street mapping" into your phone or tablet for navigation anywhere in the world without a mobile signal. It's an iOS only app
On the plus side, the android versions of other important specialist apps are as good or better than on iOS.
If you're a long time android user I'm sure there are things that bug you about it, but I wouldn't recommend apple unless you are someone who replaces your phone every 2-3 years so isn't troubled by the obselescence issue.
And, sadly, there's no real competition to the ipad. I'm amazed that the android manufacturers have gifted this segment to apple by not offering a competitive tablet.
< end rant >