Replacing train drivers, now that is funny, we could not even get rid of the guards without massive strike intervention and now we have a labour Government even less likely to happen, but a debate for a different thread.
Hope your Mum is OK Cobbs.They were using an advanced sort of system that I don't pretend to understand, but the point is, it brought them straight to us
Driverless cars is verging on science fiction IMHO.This is really about whether people will ever give up their own personal transport and be prepared to use a supplied autonomous product(s).
I think the obstacles to that are FAR greater than the glassy eyed optimists think. Both technologically and societally.
In our lifetimes perhaps.Driverless cars is verging on science fiction IMHO.
@TRITON being into your ebikes, who is the asian company people seem to buy the frame / motor / battery from and then once imported they get the rest of the parts to complete the bike. I have spoken to two lots of cyclist and both said they imported the core ebike bits from asia and one of them wrote down the company name for me but I have lost the paper.
I certainly agree that we need to be careful of what we wish for.We haven't replaced train drivers as there is very little benefit when one driver is transporting hundreds of people, the technology has existed for years. This is a different argument but we need to think carefully about replacing human jobs with technology, people need work or our society needs to be radically different.
But will those androids argue amongst themselves as to the best technique?In our lifetimes perhaps.
You'll have androids sharpening your chisels too - and much better than you!
It's a difficult moral question. We accept a certain number of (human caused) deaths by driving mistakes every year, but any car company offering an autonomous car with the equivalent safety record would be sued off the face of the planet.How safe does it need to be? Safer than human drivers or way safer than that?
Not for me, and I suspect many others. Cleaner air in built up areas is one of the most important factors to me, together with lower running costs.Let’s be honest, this isn’t about saving the environment is it?
It's about saving the motor industry, and toys for the boys.....
Let’s be honest, this isn’t about saving the environment is it?
The TFL have wanted to remove all the drivers on the underground for years. The only thing that has stopped them is the unions.I can agree to a certain extent. To be honest I'm amazed at how well our roads work considering we can be passing at 60mph with only a white line to separate us.
But I don't believe self driving cars are as good as most humans and won't be for a long time, if at all. Our 'processing' power is just much better. Adding assists to compliment drivers makes more sense to me.
We haven't even removed the drivers on trains yet and they go forward or backwards along a pre-determined route.
Is that your Luddism tendency showing through Jacob?Driverless cars is verging on science fiction IMHO.
Not sure why it's even being talked about - it doesn't solve any problems which couldn't be solved in easier and more reliable ways.
Just think of a busy town street with dozens of cars moving through - it'd only take one of them to go out of order to cause chaos. Could be just a bit of bird shi t on a sensor for instance.
We should also get away from the idea that bigger is necessarily worse. Why not consider a vehicle's efficiency rather than its size? One of our cars is a BMW 420 that is bigger than most cars I have had in the past, but also the most economical. I suggest that economy is more important than size.much better to go for smaller cars in general and to get away from the idea that bigger is necessarily better
There is no reason for cars to weigh less either. Weight is not important. Large & heavy cars can be more economical than smaller and lighter cars. Why not consider a car's economy rather than its size or weight?Even with all the things you mentioned there is no reason all that should weigh so much. The only reason it does is because people want a big car that is a living room on wheels. Even worse are the 4x4's that are not needed and cart around even more weight for no reason whatsoever,
We haven't even removed the drivers on trains yet and they go forward or backwards along a pre-determined route.
As you rightly point our trains still always have a driver or similar on them,
We haven't replaced train drivers as there is very little benefit when one driver is transporting hundreds of people, the technology has existed for years.
There are plenty of driverless trains around the world. The example I am most familiar with is the Copenhagen metro system where they rarely have any staff at all on the trains.The TFL have wanted to remove all the drivers on the underground for years. The only thing that has stopped them is the unions.
It does add up. One person in a car takes up a disproportionate amount of ground area. Yes mass transport is the right answer as well as bicycling for short trips but people always favour zero physical effort and non shared space if given the choice.That doesn't add up; you'll still have the same number of people wanting to travel, probably at similar times, it just changes what vehicle they're travelling in and might free up some car parking spaces.
The only way congestion is reduced is by getting people to travel together, a radically different times or not at all (remote working etc).
Unfortunately you’re basing your observations on the situation in a third world country, UK, look at China and you will see a very different story.It's still just science fiction, along with flying cars.
We've had sat navs for nearly two decades now, but they're still not completely reliable. Mobile phone reception still isn't over all the UK.
I think you will find a driverless car would be far more adept at reversing than the majority of current drivers….The problem for driverless cars in this part of the world would be the narrow roads. They are two way, but it's often only possible for one vehicle to fit down them. There are passing places but these are unmarked .so it depends very much on local knowledge, or paying attention to all the likely places where two cars can safely pass, whilst driving.
During the summer months there are often stand -offs between holiday makers who find themselves unable to reverse their vehicles the several hundred yards needed to find a wider part of the road. Adding driverless cars to this mix, would certainly prove interesting.
Enter your email address to join: