Dibs-h
Established Member
big soft moose":80xmqbhq said:Dibs-h":80xmqbhq said:big soft moose":80xmqbhq said:true but we are only speculating on why he was banned - i cant see philly, noel, chris etc banning him for no reason, so he might have done something that none of us know about
That's the whole point - if none of us know - then it can hardly be a post that he's replied to or started - otherwise someone would know.
It will come out in the end - either this side or on the other! I suppose it's just more incentive to visit the other side.
but there are other things that get you banned - if there was a falling out by pm , or if he had a pop at the mods by pm , or if he was operating two accounts , etc - any infarction of the rules could result in a banning and only the mods would know.
frankly i'm not that bothered - i have faith that the mods here wouldnt have banned him without good reason, and beyond that i really couldnt care less - i'm certainly not going to start lurking over there so that i can find out what happened, life is really too short.
I wasn't suggesting visiting WWUk to find out what had happened to Jacob. It was more of a case that I had actually warmed to Jacob and felt that he did have a contribution to make. It appears that there are folk (Jacob) for one who don't or won't post on here and I do feel they certainly have a lot of knowledge of which I for one do value. it was for this reason - i.e. they won't (or in some cases can't) post on here - so one has to go there (i.e. where they can post) to see their opinions.
That's not to suggest that I don't value the contributions of folk here - I certainly do.