Jacob
What goes around comes around.
Haven't got one to measure at the moment, maybe 8mm?Would be interesting to know. 10mm would be massively OTT I would have thought.
Why OTT if it does the job as claimed?
Haven't got one to measure at the moment, maybe 8mm?Would be interesting to know. 10mm would be massively OTT I would have thought.
not really it distorts a lot when heated.the thinner it is the more it pants and warpsWould be interesting to know. 10mm would be massively OTT I would have thought.
It's 8mm iirc. And no, it doesn't warp.Would be interesting to know. 10mm would be massively OTT I would have thought.
Only in so far as not much more than half your original 10 mm thickness estimate would probably do the job.Haven't got one to measure at the moment, maybe 8mm?
Why OTT if it does the job as claimed?
Agreed if it's only 2/3 mm thick.not really it distorts a lot when heated.the thinner it is the more it pants and warps
Agreed but why make it heavier than necessary. I would probably have expected it to be something like 1/4 inch in old money.The thicker the better as it would retain heat, to warp steel plate would require some temperature and stoves should not be glowing red hot !
sez 'ere; "We use heavier gauges than any other stove on the market for a multi-fuel stove, 8mm upper body up to 25mm for the grate plates."Agreed but why make it heavier than necessary. I would probably have expected it to be something like 1/4 inch in old money.
Stop worrying about them!I would have thought the rest of it would be a shapeless blob long before a 25mm plate was getting too bothered by the heat
Stove in old fireplace, short piece plain steel pipe through a plate, connecting to flue pipe up existing chimney.Are you talking only about the liner that will be in the chimney breast? Or also the rigid piece of flue connecting it to the top of the stove?
Burning just wood?
yes 904I don't know so much about the liners, other than the 316 vs 904 grade steel choice. But presume you're already aware of that choice difference?
No it's not a problem but being quick on the draw can be a big advantage in that you can get heat from a handful of loose sticks or sawdust much more quickly, if you just want to give the room a quick warm up.How much total run of flue will it be from stove to cowl? Many bends? I'm no expert, but I would be going for single if possible so that there's more heat transfer to the chimney breast which can - it turn - act as a thermal mass to a certain extent.
I think some people are keen to insulate flues with newer eco design stoves, which can be harder to start due to flues taking longer to heat and therefore longer to draw. But can't imaging that being a problem with a Dowling.
Also Dowlings are not sealed with gaskets etc so a good positive draw is extra essential.
being quick on the draw can be a big advantage in that you can get heat from a handful of loose sticks or sawdust much more quickly, if you just want to give the room a quick warm up.
There needs to be no risk of any sort of blow back with say a smouldering fire etc. Maybe not something to worry about.I might be missing something but I can't see the logic on that. You need a lot of air flow to get things going, hence why all controls go to fully open and many even have the door ajar to begin with.
What we found with our last one that it would heat up the room much faster than the central heating and probably as fast as a gas fire, just by having a fast burn of loose stuff to get it going, rocket stove style. Cast iron and firebricks not so good.That makes sense though. Mental note taken.
Enter your email address to join: