Cheshirechappie
Established Member
custard":6schlgw9 said:I don't know why Clifton persevered with the 3-in-1 shoulder plane. For years it just eroded their reputation as there was such a high percentage of duds.
Really? That's a new one on me. Mines one of the earlier 3-in-1s, and it's a good one.
There was a problem with some of the early bench planes. Clifton had made some commitments to supply in their very early years, particularly to sellers in the US. Just after that, the foundry they were using went into receivership, taking their pattern equipment with them. They had to replace the patterns and find another supplier in a very great hurry, and the first batch of castings were sub-standard. Faced with the choice of either letting down their US stockists or making the best they could of the castings they had, they chose the latter, and a bad review or two fron US woodworking journalists cost them dear for over a decade after they'd resolved the quality issues with their casting suppliers.
Don't know if the shoulder planes were caught up in the same foundry collapse problem, but maybe they were.
Apologies to Bodger for diverting the thread, but I did want to say that on the basis of MY experience, Clifton shoulder planes are good. I also recall an article in F&C comparing top-end shoulder planes, and the Cliftons came out very creditably. Some people just seem to have a downer on them for some reason, which is a bit of a shame.