Trevanion
Greatest Of All Time
Sgian Dubh":1o0ca96z said:I must admit I don't consider that to be a hard and fast rule to follow slavishly. Sometimes it's the right approach, and at other times, the arrangement you've marked with a big red X is better. If there are means to hold a panel flat, e.g., a set of table rails, and/or cross-bearers, and selecting purely on best grain match or most attractive pattern match for aesthetic reasons gives an arrangement where all the end grains 'smile' the same way, then the red X marked sketch might be the right choice.Trevanion":1o0ca96z said:The endgrain should be alternating when you're gluing them together, as highlighted in this photo:
Then there's the choice of selecting all radially sawn boards to make a panel, but that's really outwith the bounds of this thread, except perhaps to suggest it's really best to avoid edge joining something that's 1/4 sawn to a piece that's tangentially sawn because of the differential shrinkage patterns in the boards that can lead to ridges at the join line. Slainte.
This is why I referred him to your article on the subject! :lol: There are very few people with quite as much knowledge on the subject as yourself.
I agree that sometimes aesthetic comes first over anything else, especially where the construction allows for solid fixing of timber that might warp such as a solid oak staircase where the treads and risers are glued up to make the widths with the best faces showing, but perhaps not the best orientation of the timber for preventing warpage, since the threads and risers are wedged into place in a routed housing in the string this causes very little problems since there is no way the ends of the boards can cup.