Cheshirechappie":2jqvb4cw said:
So the law should apply equally, except when it's a bit inconvenient to apply it?
We've already seen where that leads us in places like Rotherham, Rochdale and a whole host of others. Not a good situation.
I didn't say that? I said I agreed with the law being applied equally.
As for those particular cases, well there was equally a huge pattern of brushing abuse under the carpet in the 1970s with all those infamous cases that came to light when Savile snuffed it. Are the rumours of widespread abuse by senior politicians true? If so - what's the difference?
I suppose my issue with the way its presented is that the race of the perpetrators is somehow linked to the crime itself. Only one thing makes someone a paedophile, and that's....being a paedophile. The way its presented in the media is that they (intentionally, at times) highlight the racial profile when the perpetrator is not white, as if almost to say that's somehow relevant. It explains why the two headlines "Two men convicted of rape" and "Two black men convicted of rape" aren't meant to protray the same story - because I'd guarantee the first case was white men so let's look at the horror of rape, and the second one is to make people have negative thoughts of black men in general. You can thank the Daily Fail for that.