That's just plain 100% wrong, you do not understand the information you have posted.
A. You do not know that, and the Moderna COO did not say that. Absence of proof is not absence of effect. He was saying Moderna do not know., as its practically speaking impossible to test that in the context of the safety and efficacy trials. How on earth do you use that as evidence for your absolute statement that it does zip all to stop transmission?
B. The point of a vaccine is to ensure that the body can deal with an infection and avoid disease or at least reduce disease prevalence and/or severity. It is proven to do that. It is also proven safe for people in categories represented in the trials.
C. As for quoting hydroxychloriquine and zinc, OK more evidence of dirty mis/disinformation habits. Well proven that they do nothing, overwhelming evidence of that.
D. Remdesivir is a partial treatment for which there is some but mixed evidence that it may improve severe disease ie ARDS. By that time, the patient is very severely ill and in HDU/ITU, with the aim being to stop death - you do not want to be there in the first place. That is 2-3 weeks later than the pre-symptomatic phase in which the Moderna COO was saying it was unclear whether there would be enough viral replication to enable transmission in the period while the immune response kicks in.
E. I have no idea what point you think are making in relation to the WHO quote.
Oh dear. There is no evidence it is dangerous, that was the purpose of the trials. It is absolutely fortunate for the people I agree on that.