They don't really know for certain they're effective against the existing one.
....with the risk of catching it reduced by 90%. It's a no brainer.well it’s only 90% effective anyway, so if everyone in the UK got vaccinated that leaves 6m people at risk.
....with the risk of catching it reduced by 90%. It's a no brainer.
It is solving at least one problem, which is that the NHS can cope with 10% of the possible number of cases that it may otherwise have to deal with, leaving resources available for all the cancer patients and others who are currently being neglected.my point was that taking it is not solving the problem, just reducing it.
I read/watched somewhere a great talk about statistics, the only point that sticks in my head was the speaker saying something like "The statistics show, that in Britain, the average number of arms a person has is less than 2"I heard on the radio years ago a speaker giving a talk on the misuse of statistics........
And nearly 50% of the people in this country are of below average intelligence. No wonder we're in such a mess.I read/watched somewhere a great talk about statistics, the only point that sticks in my head was the speaker saying something like "The statistics show, that in Britain, the average number of arms a person has is less than 2"
That's the same with any vaccine though; but if you can get a decent percentage of the population immune to a particular virus then you greatly reduce the rates of transmission - such that those who cannot be vaccinated (or those who refuse, or those for whom it doesn't work) have a much reduced change of becoming infected.my point was that taking it is not solving the problem, just reducing it.
At those kind of levels you're entering into herd immunity. So many people can't get it that it helps protect those that might be susceptible. This is how most diseases are controlled. The differece here is that instead of waiting for people to spread the disease and die from it as they originally planned, immunity will be raised by injection.well it’s only 90% effective anyway, so if everyone in the UK got vaccinated that leaves 6m people at risk.
Starmer is hardly the first person to have suggested it. Even public polling has suggested for weeks that xmas should have been cancelled. The govt probably didn't ask for an actual vote on it in case they dind't get the answer they wanted, not the first time in recent memory after all.Honestly - I believe Boris is a libertarian who had no intention of constraining Christmas beyond the previous arrangements. But the new fact(s) about the new strain and more recent epidemiological studies (less than 48 hours old) scared him shitless. If he was ever to discharge his responsibilities as leader he had no option to put the measures in place announced today.
Bad as it is for those put into Tier 4 it is no way as bad as listening to that odious worm Kier Starmer shrieking ’I told the PM he should do this last Wednesday’ - Hey Keir - the critical information was not available then!
My two neighbours and I have an average of one leg each.And nearly 50% of the people in this country are of below average intelligence. No wonder we're in such a mess.
But they're not the ones making it.And nearly 50% of the people in this country are of below average intelligence. No wonder we're in such a mess.
Within 20 minutes we had reorganised xmas for an as yet to be finally agreed date in March.
2021 will be the year of two xmases!
Enter your email address to join: