flying haggis
Established Member
Just be thankful we don't use the completely confusing L/100kmWe have miles, and miles per hour. My car tells me my average miles per gallon. But we don’t buy gallons of petrol any more. Hmmm.
Just be thankful we don't use the completely confusing L/100kmWe have miles, and miles per hour. My car tells me my average miles per gallon. But we don’t buy gallons of petrol any more. Hmmm.
....too much Private Eye.....shurely not.......Been reading too much Private Eye?
I think you missed the point20p a foot? how many decades ago was this?
I have said for a long time that furniture made in imperial sizes is more comfortable.I find it a lot easier to design furniture in feet and inches. After all "Man is the measure of all things", so designing in in terms of "feet", makes perfect sense, as should "spans" and "hands". It more directly links the objects to us.
I also find it a lot easier to work out, and play around with proportions, based on the old imperial system.
As I get older I find I'm forced to use metric more and more often. Nowadays when measuring up I do imperial first then check in Metric (measure twice, cut once, etc.)I have absolutely no problem in working in imperial or metric, but I find it easier to make a mistake in metric. Yes metric is simpler but most of the great technical advances were made under imperial or the US version of it! The point about all of the peculiar(?) imperial measurements is that they mostly are for certain trades. Surveyors would use chains, a farmer bushels etc. You would know and understand those you worked with and probably ignored others.
I didn't.I think you missed the point
Enter your email address to join: