andersonec":rinxz3tw said:
Jelly":rinxz3tw said:
I dispute the superiority, I can shave the hair off my arm with a hand honed edge (admittedly only when I lap on extremely fine paper after using the oilstone) that level of sharpness is not neccesary for the vast majority of tasks.
Once you get to grips with it, hand sharpening is also indisputably quicker.
Jelly,
I sharpen the blade for my planes on oilstones (also from the sixties) by hand, the reason? it leaves a slightly convex edge not because it's quicker, I have an oil stone for honing which must be approx 8/10,000 grit (again from the sixties) I strop the blade on the palm of my left hand and it could also shave the hairs on your arm. Chisels I sharpen with the help of a guide to leave a 90deg flat and square edge.
Sharpening by guide leaves a square edge great for chisels, sharpening by hand leaves a slightly convex edge, great for plane irons as you don't leave lines where the edge of the blade passes through the wood so a combination of both techniques is for me the best system.
There is no reason I can think of to take my blades anywhere near a grinding wheel other than to to regrind the bevel angle on a seriously damaged blade, say one that has been used to chop concrete.
Andy
I whole heartedly agree on grinding; beyond that, as I said a while back, sharpening techniques are as unique as the woodworker who uses them.
We both seem to be achiving comparable results with different systems which illustrates the point nicely, I will say that sharpening my paring chisels dead flat by hand is more time consuming, but the rest of them can happily be convex for me. Perhaps the overiding factor for me is that when I'm at work, being able to reach to the shelf for my stone, hone the edge and replace the stone* in almost no time is a big positive...
*A double sided ones bought in a tiny cave like shop, 200/800 grit. I tend to finish up on either 2000 or 4000 grit paper with a drop of oil if i want that super fine, shaving edge...