JamesJ
New member
Hi all,
I know this is the archetypal newbie question - but it is really driving me nuts! Since I started doing woodwork I seem to have spent my life trying to get my plane blades to behave and get them reasonably sharp. I have read countless articles, blog posts, watched videos etc... I don't want to become a sharpening freak (I would rather like to spend my time making stuff), but just cannot get it right and cannot afford to buy loads of stuff (e.g. a diamond stone to flatten them etc). Here is where I am up to so far:
I have a have combination Norton waterstone 1000/4000, a piece of 30x30cm float glass, a sharpening guide (I know, I know) and an old electric grind stone.
The waterstone I cannot keep flat. I draw the lines on in pencil to test it, but the water just washed them away. Wet and dry blunts in an instant when I use it to flatten the stone and anyway the 4000 hates w&d and just leaves grit tracks all over it. So the waterstone becomes concave and somehow this results in a plane blade that leaves plane track edges on the wood!?! Surely it should make a convex blade not a concave one!
I had a go at scary sharp, but the very pricey paper (£1 a sheet!), would rip with the smallest speck of grit.
So my aim is to get a flat straight blade with a sharp edge and then David Charlesworth tells me I shouldn't have one of these anyway! He wants be to create a sharp convex blade, which I can sort of see (no plane tracks like I manage), but this just seems to complicate things...
To add to it all I have inherited a whole bin bag of oilstones... which I hear don't need to be flattened... sounds ideal... Plus I have a lovely range of grades etc (If they were good enough for my great-grandfathers surely they should be good enough for me!), but they don't look wide enough to use my beloved sharpening guide on.
It is all SO confusing... I just want to be one of these people who can grab a blade and sharpen it to shave with on an old rock they found lying around outside...! Surely to goodness it cannot be this complicated?
Help!
James
I know this is the archetypal newbie question - but it is really driving me nuts! Since I started doing woodwork I seem to have spent my life trying to get my plane blades to behave and get them reasonably sharp. I have read countless articles, blog posts, watched videos etc... I don't want to become a sharpening freak (I would rather like to spend my time making stuff), but just cannot get it right and cannot afford to buy loads of stuff (e.g. a diamond stone to flatten them etc). Here is where I am up to so far:
I have a have combination Norton waterstone 1000/4000, a piece of 30x30cm float glass, a sharpening guide (I know, I know) and an old electric grind stone.
The waterstone I cannot keep flat. I draw the lines on in pencil to test it, but the water just washed them away. Wet and dry blunts in an instant when I use it to flatten the stone and anyway the 4000 hates w&d and just leaves grit tracks all over it. So the waterstone becomes concave and somehow this results in a plane blade that leaves plane track edges on the wood!?! Surely it should make a convex blade not a concave one!
I had a go at scary sharp, but the very pricey paper (£1 a sheet!), would rip with the smallest speck of grit.
So my aim is to get a flat straight blade with a sharp edge and then David Charlesworth tells me I shouldn't have one of these anyway! He wants be to create a sharp convex blade, which I can sort of see (no plane tracks like I manage), but this just seems to complicate things...
To add to it all I have inherited a whole bin bag of oilstones... which I hear don't need to be flattened... sounds ideal... Plus I have a lovely range of grades etc (If they were good enough for my great-grandfathers surely they should be good enough for me!), but they don't look wide enough to use my beloved sharpening guide on.
It is all SO confusing... I just want to be one of these people who can grab a blade and sharpen it to shave with on an old rock they found lying around outside...! Surely to goodness it cannot be this complicated?
Help!
James