monoman
Member
Bugbear, could you rephrase. I'm not sure exactly what you are trying to say.
monoman":28gkmm14 said:Bugbear, could you rephrase. I'm not sure exactly what you are trying to say.
Succinct, as ever...nice :lol: :lol: - RobJake":1g268m05 said:In other words, perhaps, about when you can count the angels dancing on the edge, it is time to stop (or do I mean strop?).
Im not arguing about that. Yes. Look at a really sharp edge under an scanning electron microscope (SEM) and it will look anything but sharp, maybe even round. So what? I've never looked at any of my blades under an SEM, have you? None of this is particularly relevant to us planing wood.bugbear":npimh5px said:I think "some here" are quite right. Your point about scale is accurate (in that a sharp edge under enough magnification is round) but not relevant. An edge that requires extreme magnification to appear round is what we normally, and reasonably, call "sharp".monoman":npimh5px said:<i>Some here seem to think that the blade starts sharp and after a while looks like the Brent of Steve's drawings when it is dull. That simply is not the case. The blade looks like that from the very first pass - only the scale changes.</i>
monoman":14rxv87m said:![]()
For out purposes, let's say the black line represents a freshly sharpened blade, and the red line is a worn blade. What I meant by scale is that the blade will start to look like the red line straight away, only the size of it will be smaller. It changes gradually as each metre is planed.