Cheshirechappie
Established Member
Jacob":1zr2bn9x said:.....The head scratching is about what you do next and the answer isn't clear.Cheshirechappie":1zr2bn9x said:Jacob - that approach to debate leads to such things as 'no-platforming', safe spaces in university common rooms, the Snowflake generation and a host of other phenomena discussed in various places lately. It leads to living in an information echo-chamber, and apparent incredulity and refusal to accept not only the result, the very idea that anybody might vote a different way when a democratic vote goes they way you don't want.
Grow up, accept that the Western world is a different place politically than it was last year, and like the rest of us, try to understand why.
"Brexit means brexit" has the same logic as "a trip to the moon is a trip to the moon". There's nothing in there to show how it could be done, or even if it's possible at all.
I think it's quite clear why the entire establishment is in a tizz about it. They held the referendum complacently expecting a Remain result; indeed they were so complacent, they didn't even get the Civil Service to work up any contingency plans for the event of a Leave vote. Given that there were only two possible results, and the opinion polls were within 10%, some might regard that as a rather strange omission.
Be that as it may, gummint and Civil Service now have to do something about it, and they are, to give them some credit. Personally, I think it will come as a shock to many people just how much of the UK's government is currently down to Brussels, or effectively directed from Brussels. That said, the more thought goes into how we disentangle ourselves before we trigger Article 50 the better.