Separately, in theory, suboptimal hardness in a catra machine (abrasive cards) results in some loss of abrasion resistance. I think in real life use, deformation of edges on soft knives causes the wear to occur much faster. Just as it would with chisels. I was kind of shocked to find that a slightly underhard AEB-L knife ground much faster than a relatively high hardness 80crv2 knife. AEB-L's theoretical wear resistance is about 60-70% higher than 80crV2.
Like the fellow getting knives from me, I'd rather deal with a knife that doesn't need steeling if given a personal choice - but goes back to the not barking about knives intended to be steeled being unusable. Most larger butchers knives that I've seen are steeled often and I'm sure if they are carbon steel, they are something similar to 80crv2 in high 50s hardness instead of low 60s. 1095CV is spec'd in a lot of low end knives here with a hardness target of 55/56. That's a weird combination and some of the makers have left that for 1075 (ontario knife, I think, is one of them). 80crV2 can hit 62 hardness without a problem and be tough enough - so adding carbon and then backing off 6-7 points of hardness, is kind of senseless.
(XHP in the scatter above is V11 for anyone wondering if we use any of the stainless steels in woodworking).
It is also low toughness. When I mention that it's not that great for chisels, it draws some static. A rehardened stanley 750 betters it without trouble. But for the folks who rarely use their tools, finding any significant rust is unlikely since it's on the functional border of stainless.
Like the fellow getting knives from me, I'd rather deal with a knife that doesn't need steeling if given a personal choice - but goes back to the not barking about knives intended to be steeled being unusable. Most larger butchers knives that I've seen are steeled often and I'm sure if they are carbon steel, they are something similar to 80crv2 in high 50s hardness instead of low 60s. 1095CV is spec'd in a lot of low end knives here with a hardness target of 55/56. That's a weird combination and some of the makers have left that for 1075 (ontario knife, I think, is one of them). 80crV2 can hit 62 hardness without a problem and be tough enough - so adding carbon and then backing off 6-7 points of hardness, is kind of senseless.
(XHP in the scatter above is V11 for anyone wondering if we use any of the stainless steels in woodworking).
It is also low toughness. When I mention that it's not that great for chisels, it draws some static. A rehardened stanley 750 betters it without trouble. But for the folks who rarely use their tools, finding any significant rust is unlikely since it's on the functional border of stainless.