Armed with my Trend locking mitre router bit, I embarked upon the task of joining four pieces of Iroko to form the sides of a box this afternoon.
I like mitres, but find them a little finnicky to.glueup.
The locking mitre solution looks a good one, but positioning the bit and fence is a very precise task. Bit height, timber thickness and fence position all need fine tuning to get a good result.
With 11mm thick timber, I ended up with the bit set at 9.8mm high and the fence 7.5mm in front of the mid point of the bit (for both the horizontal amd vertical cuts. This yielded a good result, but took an amount of fiddling to achieve.
Has anyone got a reliable, structured method of doing this, maybe based on a data set showing the relationships between the variables? Trend do not appear to publish such data, yet underlying the processs, must exist a set of quantifiable data.
Anyone had success with tbis type of mitre bit? Thrown the towel in? Found a better way?
Cheers
I like mitres, but find them a little finnicky to.glueup.
The locking mitre solution looks a good one, but positioning the bit and fence is a very precise task. Bit height, timber thickness and fence position all need fine tuning to get a good result.
With 11mm thick timber, I ended up with the bit set at 9.8mm high and the fence 7.5mm in front of the mid point of the bit (for both the horizontal amd vertical cuts. This yielded a good result, but took an amount of fiddling to achieve.
Has anyone got a reliable, structured method of doing this, maybe based on a data set showing the relationships between the variables? Trend do not appear to publish such data, yet underlying the processs, must exist a set of quantifiable data.
Anyone had success with tbis type of mitre bit? Thrown the towel in? Found a better way?
Cheers