So the dust has had a bit of time to settle, and the left/establishment positions seems to be that:
- Trump is now completely insane (even more than before).
- The right are violent, insane, led by a madman, and utterly unworthy of anything other than contempt, because they attacked the very core of America
- Trump instigated the attack personally, with his speech.
- The administration (ie Trump personally) removed all the police in order to allow the storming of the Capitol Building.
- The election was free and fair, and there is no evidence, nor has there ever been any evidence, of a rigged election. See point 1. Any evidence to the contrary is trifling and irrelevant and couldn't have had any significant effect, therefore see point 1.
I'm sure there is more but that will do to be going on with. Has anyone on here actually seen the counter narratives? They are out there, but if you stick with the BBC or the Guardian you aren't going to see the other side of the story. As I mentioned several pages back, reality is no longer relevant - it's all about the narrative.
So, first up - evidence that the violence was perpetrated by BLM /Antifa rent-a-mob:
FALSE FLAG CONFIRMED: . Is it true? I don't know, but it is interesting nonetheless. I also see that the internet is awash with "factchecked" refutations that Antifa or BLM were there - the lady do'st protest too much?
Next up - Trump called for the attack during his speech . Well, I tried reading through the transcript of his speech, looking for an explicit call to arms , but it was pretty turgid stuff so I gave up before I found anything. Perhaps you can do better (attention deficit disorder?):
Donald Trump Speech "Save America" Rally Transcript January 6 - Rev
I did find this specific quote from later on:
"I know your pain, I know you’re hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us, it was a landslide election and everyone knows it especially the other side.
"But you have to go home now, we have to have peace, we have to have law and order, we have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt."
I have no knowledge/opinion regarding who set the policing levels at the Capitol Building - perhaps someone else does. The real question is - who benefits most from a violent invasion of government? You could make arguments for either side, which means either side
might have been responsible, plus the conspiracy theory nutty idea that non-political others actually benefit most from political chaos (that would be the Color Revolution idea).
Now, the real crux of all this is whether or not the election was fraudulent. As I understand it there is plenty of evidence, but the various courts have refused to actually look at it. All the media say that there is no evidence, because the courts threw it all out, but the courts cleverly avoided any consideration of actual evidence, and refused the various claims on procedural grounds. Anyhoo, as they say in Canada, here is some "evidence", just in case you wanted to see what the the other lot have got their knickers in a twist about.
Election 2020 Was Rigged: The Evidence - Geller Report News
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...es-how-the-democrats-rigged-the-2020-electionI won't post any more - lefties will ignore it because it is obviously right wing and therefore insane, and anyone who actually has an interest can rummage the internet on their own. My own position is that I would never trust an electronic voting machine, no matter how many people assured me it was honest and true. Paper votes or it never happened.
In conclusion, for anyone who's eyes haven't glazed over already; the right seem to think that the election was stolen, but more importantly that the checks and balances to protect democracy have failed to give them a voice. In other words, they are disenfranchised. The Second Amendment allows lots of guns for exactly this reason (according to all the right wingers, that is). If I was a democrat I would be wearing squeaky shoes these days. If I was an evil manipulator trying to cause maximum chaos and split the communities, I probably wouldn't have done much differently.
It's almost as if someone truly wants different sections of Americans at each other's throats. Who would benefit from that?