bugbear":136cz1tu said:essexalan":136cz1tu said:D_W":136cz1tu said:I would presume that what made the Arkansas stones so desirable to the English market 125 years ago was their consistency. Very little practical difference between translucent stones from different mines.
Probably the consistency of supply as well as quality. I get the feeling that a lot of UK stones were a bit of a cottage industry while the US got the extraction and shaping mechanised very quickly. Odd that Washita stones seem to outnumber the various other Arkansas stones by a considerable margin in the secondhand shops and ebay.
I imagine that's the ratio the quarry spits 'em out in.
BugBear
something like that. I remember when I was a kid washita was a cheaper, utility grade tradesman's stone. I used a washita stone as my only stone for a number of years, borrowing time on a bench grinder when I needed to do any heavy shaping work. I still have the broken pieces of that stone somewhere.