Indeed if what I find here: http://www.greatbritishwoodshop.co.uk/D ... ?tabid=170 is correct then this is the actual legislation: (at bottom)
Does a longer arbour actually break the law? Is this actually anything to do with arbours at all? You could after all restrict it in other ways, by putting an plate which only accepts 15.5mm and below, on a long arbour. When it was tested it would, technically meet the CE requirement - of course we know woodworkers would take this straight out and make another if needed to run a larger stacked dado set. Still, in its "purchased" for the saw would, technically be CE compliant.
Does a longer arbour actually break the law? Is this actually anything to do with arbours at all? You could after all restrict it in other ways, by putting an plate which only accepts 15.5mm and below, on a long arbour. When it was tested it would, technically meet the CE requirement - of course we know woodworkers would take this straight out and make another if needed to run a larger stacked dado set. Still, in its "purchased" for the saw would, technically be CE compliant.
The specification for saw tables as issued by the British Standards Institute, (this is the body that issues the CE certification to tool manufacturers), states that the maximum width of cutting blade (currently acceptable to the BSI) must not exceed 15.5mm, that’s over a half an inch in width, and this is what is currently allowable, but none of the manufacturers we have seen are taking advantage of this, we are not sure why. That's a pretty wide dado and would certainly make life easier for all the British woodworkers that long to perform this type of operation.
There are a couple of other issues that must be accommodated for example, the blade must come to a standstill within 10 seconds of the machine being stopped, a restriction on the saw blade diameter, they must make sure the saw blade can not come loose during start up, running, run down or braking and recommendations are made in the BSI document on how this can be achieved and flanged bushes need to be provided where the spindle diameter is different from the bore size of the saw blade. All these things considered there certainly seems room for manufactures to take advantage of grooving operations for UK saws. The other point to make is that manufacturers do not have to follow the guidelines outlined in the BSI document. These are purely guidelines, any manufacture can submit a design to the BSI and they will check it and test it to ensure it meets their requirements and if it does it will be passed even if it’s not exactly the way the guidelines are currently written. This allows the manufacturer room to be inventive in how they design their equipment.