RogerS":2t77hwc5 said:
Garno, you make some valid observations but the one critical factor that you've overlooked is not whether what he did was right or wrong, legal or illegal, whether he should be sacked or not...all of these matter not one jot. What matters is how his actions are perceived by the general public. We are being asked to carry out a certain way of life for the moment, lockdown etc. But when we see someone in his position doing whatever he wants and not perceived to be 'obeying' the same 'rules' as the rest of us, then it is human nature to say 'Damn that...if he can do that then so can I'.
And therein lies the danger. You only have to look at what happened in the last few days at Weston Hospital to see just how easy things can go pear-shaped quite quickly.
Just my two cents - I agree with the sentiments of Garno, "there but for the grace of god" and all that, but the reality and the political reality for Boris is what Roger has said.
DC (Cummings not Coultard) isn't a man for whom his actions have no real world consequence, unlike the rest of us. Perception can be everything, as Amy Cooper in America (google it) learned recently to her extreme cost.
DC's situation could well have been utterly unavoidable, but then lying about it (or what looks like it) and the "drove 30 miles for an eyetest" stretched credulity - it's all downhill after that.
His either extreme naivety of how this would be perceived - or extreme stupidity that this could be ridden out has just inflamed the situation tenfold.
Hence the burning torches and pitchforks - because the polite and calm calls for his resignation or sacking have been loudly ignored.
The other side of this equation that many of the more cogniscent are understanding is that Boris is buying himself a major problem come the next election - wholesale - during a time when the country needs govt stability; regardless of what you think of the Conservatives, a forced change of Govt via a no confidence situation, and all that goes with that, would be a bloody distaster over the next 12 / 24 / 36 months, and Boris isn't exactly swimming in an excess of political capital to squander away on this. I absolutely beleive that Labour, given half a sniff, would use this situation to force that no confidence vote, regardless of how costly it would be to the country, for the opportunity to reverse Brexit and further thier own agenda.
Those that see all this are practically screaming at Boris to cut this guy loose - and those who aren't seeing this other side of the equation are assuming the pleb(ian)s of the "braying hounds" pitchfork carrying persuasion and the political "this is going to cost you bigtime Boris" group are one and the same.
So all is not quite as it seems Garno, a little temperance may be in order.