flattening chisel backs with lapping film

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Jacob

Only you could misinterpret what has been written in this thread in such a stupid way, we don't do what you think.

Phil P comment was correct its what ever works for you is the best system, stop forcing your opinion on people if its not sharpening its benches, we are all different and like to work in different ways.
You like to bang on about your pet subjects and that might put people off, and it spoils the threads needles arguing back and forth just because people won't do things your way, can you not stop commenting?

Pete
 
Pete

If you don't like reading or discussing alternative views of how to do things then why don't you just keep out of the thread?
 
If you bother to read various threads posted recently you will see that several people have been doing just what I said i.e. using soft water stones for flattening which themselves require flattening ("every few minutes" in one thread), and diamond plates are bought for this purpose. No tactic involved, not stupid and not dishonest.

The previous 2 posters stupid and dishonest tactic is to attack the messenger when they don't like the message. Always an indication that they have lost the argument, such as it is, and an attempt to turn it into a slanging match instead.
 
Well, it only took 13 pages before we got round to arguing about the validity (or lack thereof) of arguing about sharpening...
 
Fromey":3613t685 said:
mickthetree":3613t685 said:
Do ezelap do an extra extra course? Saw one of these in axminster the other day, looks like its got teeth!!

I've not seen greater than "coarse" in any UK online store. However, Dieter Schmid sells "extra coarse" Exe-Lap plates;

http://www.fine-tools.com/ezelap-diasharpener.html

I've read elsewhere that some consider the DMT extra-extra coarse is in fact too coarse and leaves deep scratches. "coarse" plates are sold for flattening stones in sharpening kits, so I've just bought a DMT one from Dick (sniggers) as they are cheaper than UK sources even with the postage factored in;

http://www.mehr-als-werkzeug.de/product ... coarse.htm

This may help and is something I learned when I was heavily involved in collecting Japanese swords and learning about sword polishing (The Japanese version of sharpening whilst enhancing surface patterns within forge welded steel and iron).

As with water stones, the correct method of using them is to adhere to using the grits in sequence, BUT alternating direction of travel (i.e. Straight, diagonal left, diagonal right, straight) with each grit change and this helps remove scratch patterns formed via previous grits. Otherwise - if travelling in the same direction with each progressive grit - you'll often find scratch patterns "tram-line" and difficult to remove/eradicate. The difference between using diamond and water stones isn't solely wear, as diamond plates lack the ability to create slurry, which - in the later stages of sharpening - helps one refine surfaces even further by virtue of the presence of increasingly finer slurry-bound particles. Nagura stones aren't solely used for flattening, as their primary purpose is two fold in both flattening and the creation of slurry. In terms of softer stones wearing faster, it's the nature of the beast, because using harder stones on hard steel tends to be slow progress as the stone surface doesn't fracture - renewing the necessary cutting texture continually. Soft stones constantly surface fracture with their surface texture constantly renewed to reveal fresh cutting particles.

Basic rule of thumb when using water stones;

Soft stone = hard steel
Hard stone = soft steel

it's much the reason behind Japanese water stones being so highly prices and prized in Japan and - whilst not necessarily as important to carpenters - Japanese sword polishers tend to have an extremely wide selection of stones to work from due to the need to match stone to steel being worked upon.

Use of wider than necessary stones can prove problematical when sharpening items narrower than the stone's width. It proves more difficult for one to use the bulk of the stone's surface evenly, than if using narrower stone and you tend to find the need to re-flatten surfaces far more frequently than should be necessary.

I hope the above helps in some way, but need to say Jacob isn't wrong in what he says about users finding themselves needing to flatten stones far more frequently than should be necessary, but much is to do with them not fully understanding the medium with which they're working.
 
I don't think flattening waterstones with each other is a very common practice. I tried that for a while and it was painfully slow, and it didn't produce really flat stones. Then I used the sandpaper on glass method for a while, but beacuse sandpaper is such a bother I reached deep into my pocket and bought an DMT extra course diamond plate. No looking back since then. Easy and quick flattening.

Waterstones certainly have disdvantages, muddy, need flattening more often then oilstones, not cheap. But they pay back in a major way. They are fast! And they just feel good, not like diamond plates which feel like scraping with fingernails on a blackboard. And the fine waterstones give you wonderfully sharp edges. And they are certainly better on the more modern steels like A2, D2, CPM3V, PM-V11.

Disadvantage of oilstones: I didn't like the oily mess and the dirty fingers. They certainly cut slower. You can't get fine stones as fine as the waterstones, so a strop is needed. And really good fine oilstones are hard to get and not cheap either. Of course, these are disadvantages you can live with, just as the disadvantages from waterstones. At the end it's what you prefer. They all get your irons sharp.
 
Jelly":2kfqepr6 said:
Well, it only took 13 pages before we got round to arguing about the validity (or lack thereof) of arguing about sharpening...
:lol:
I think for some people it's a struggle to come up with a good idea, so once they think they have one they get a bit possessive about it and don't want to lose it!
 
Garry, the new "ceramic" waterstones, like the Sigma, the Bester and the Shaptons are a lot harder then the old clay based stones, but work a lot faster too on the new hard steels. So I guess your info is a bit old.
 
Corneel":34nfb8yb said:
Garry, the new "ceramic" waterstones, like the Sigma, the Bester and the Shaptons are a lot harder then the old clay based stones, but work a lot faster too on the new hard steels. So I guess your info is a bit old.


My information is as current as your's, but focused upon natural stones and not artificial ones. I think the point is more regarding relevance than anything to do with being up to date. Whilst Sigma, Bester and Shapton produce standardised stones, they're not necessarily harder than their natural counterparts. They simply eliminate the gamble and provide the user with qualities of a known quantity, but - IMHO the downside - they also limit user choice to a certain extent. Everything's a trade-off.
 
Corneel":3pzd84wy said:
....... And they are certainly better on the more modern steels like A2, D2, CPM3V, PM-V11.
No prob with A2 on oilstones. I was surprised
Disadvantage of oilstones: I didn't like the oily mess and the dirty fingers. They certainly cut slower. You can't get fine stones as fine as the waterstones, so a strop is needed. And really good fine oilstones are hard to get and not cheap either......
To keep clean I use a rare earth magnet to take off swarf and have plenty of cleaning cloth available. Old cotton sheets best.
To improve the cut I freshen the surface every now and then with a 3m diapad (like this one) but I expect wet n dry would do.
You can get all grades of oilstone down to very fine , too fine for woodwork, not too expensive.
And they last for life and never need flattening.
 
Jacob":mlomjonl said:
To keep clean I use a rare earth magnet to take off swarf and have plenty of cleaning cloth available. Old cotton sheets best.
To improve the cut I freshen the surface every now and then with a 3m diapad (like this one) but I expect wet n dry would do.
You can get very fine oil tones, too fine for woodwork, not too expensive.
And they last for life and never need flattening.

Translucent Arkansas leave a beautiful edge and I think it's a flip of the coin between them and Hard Black Arkansas. Tied in with Washita and they leave a very real sense of the reasoning why many of our forebears discarded their Charnley Forest, etc. stones.
 
GazPal":3iiud27d said:
My information is as current as your's, but focused upon natural stones and not artificial ones. I think the point is more regarding relevance than anything to do with being up to date. Whilst Sigma, Bester and Shapton produce standardised stones, they're not necessarily harder than their natural counterparts. They simply eliminate the gamble and provide the user with qualities of a known quantity, but - IMHO the downside - they also limit user choice to a certain extent. Everything's a trade-off.

Ok, sorry, I didn't realise that. Natural water stones are a quite different thing I guess.
 
Corneel":1pnlqidx said:
GazPal":1pnlqidx said:
My information is as current as your's, but focused upon natural stones and not artificial ones. I think the point is more regarding relevance than anything to do with being up to date. Whilst Sigma, Bester and Shapton produce standardised stones, they're not necessarily harder than their natural counterparts. They simply eliminate the gamble and provide the user with qualities of a known quantity, but - IMHO the downside - they also limit user choice to a certain extent. Everything's a trade-off.

Ok, sorry, I didn't realise that. Natural water stones are a quite different thing I guess.

There's never any need for sorry my friend.

-----------

I think much more store is placed upon use of the many varied sharpening media out there than need be. This isn't aimed at anyone in particular, as I'm all for people using whichever system works for them, but I do wish it could be done without the hyperbole sometimes used via overly passionate enthusiast attempting to portray the methods/materials they use as the sole way of doing things. I feel the same way regarding views concerning tool types and uses.
 
madge":2g00md6i said:
Hi all, I recently took a plunge down the slope and got a set of blue spruce paring chisels and today I got around to flattening the backs. After refreshing my memory with a couple of youtube videos from lie nielsen and rob cosman I set to work with lapping film on float glass but the results were much less than my expectations. Even on the coarsest grade of 40 microns I achieved patchy results with all but the smallest chisels showing a polish in the centre and a good couple of mms missed around the edges. Having achieved reasonable results on a set of ashley iles in the past I was surprised that the blue spruces didn't succumb in the same way. I'm pretty sure that the film is flat with no air bubbles and I tried to apply pressure evenly and not rock the chisel as I moved it. I spent close to an hour on the 1/2 inch size and didn't end up with an even polish. I'm thinking that 40 microns just isn't coarse enough but I've scoured the internet for a coarser grade and the next size seems to be 100 - is this too coarse? I have a diamond stone with a 1000 grit side too, would that be finer than 100 micron film and suitable for the first stage? Thanks in advance for any ideas.

The measure of flatness of a chisel's back is this: it must be flat enough to flex the burr back and forth between the beveled side. If it's not you can't easily remove the burr or you have to tip the chisel up when working the back - a de facto 'Ruler Trick' which I don't particularly care for.
 
Not by me it isn't! If it will get the job done it's fine. Subsequent honings will gradually remove the bevel anyway, but if it's critical you can just choose another chisel.
 
Jacob":2q32nrea said:
Not by me it isn't! If it will get the job done it's fine. Subsequent honings will gradually remove the bevel anyway, but if it's critical you can just choose another chisel.

Well.....not if you've dubbed the edge of all your chisels in the rush to get the job done..... :roll:
 
Back
Top