Once a thread is 6 pages long, it can go anywhere.
Back to the sharpening, I can give a comparison of times, because I had to use a guide while testing irons so that someone else could duplicate my results. There are a few trolls who think lee valley is out to get them, so they had an immediate reversal of affection as soon as I got results.
God, I hate guides. I used charlesworth's sharpening method when i first started, and at that point, it was great. I literally took notes from his early video because I hadn't started woodworking, followed the methods end to end and had a sharp iron the first time. So, I used that method as I had old guides, and for testing purposes, I needed to use diamonds so that no iron would be criticized as incompletely sharpened. Stones and sharpening are a side hobby of mine, just like toolmaking.
Cycle time for honing with a diamond plate as a secondary bevel and 1 micron diamonds as tertiary - 4 minutes. Agonizing. That's with ruler trick and then confirmation of wire edge removal since some of the steels have an extreme taste for keeping it.
The guide takes away some of your touch with the iron, even if it's the eclipse type (Which is probably the best type for someone to at least learn a little touch). You can't lean on it, you can't manipulate it as much as freehand. Agonizing.
Cycle time without a guide, same stones, same irons, about 1 minute and 20 seconds. The sharpness difference is effectively nil, and I tested duration of edge life and freehand is within 10% (it may be even on another repetition). That tells me that I may have freehanded slightly less clearance, but it didn't amount to much, and in the balance, I'd much prefer that. Shallower is always possible to match edge life.
As much as it was interesting to plane several miles and see how long irons actually last in a controlled test, it's about 1/20th as important as being able to sharpen well and quickly.
If there is any speculation about edge quality, mine is better than most. Maybe not all, but most.
The scope pictures for the irons came out of the availability of it (as in, i already had it, so no reason not to use, plus it's interesting to see what edges look like on the same piece of wood (as in, do some fail in bits while others do it evenly- in clean wood, the answer is, no really, though the plainer the steel in traditional steels, the more uniform the edge quality will be).
But nothing will teach a new woodworker more than a less durable iron and dimensioning by hand. You'll get good at sharpening quickly.
Other than perhaps richard mcguire (however his name is spelled), I don't think any of the instructor gurus do much dimensioning. Chris Schwarz planes a lot of already flat pine boards, and I've seen sellers squaring wood up in a few videos - it was agonizing. He may have been making more than one point at the time, but it was pretty rough.
Back to the sharpening, I can give a comparison of times, because I had to use a guide while testing irons so that someone else could duplicate my results. There are a few trolls who think lee valley is out to get them, so they had an immediate reversal of affection as soon as I got results.
God, I hate guides. I used charlesworth's sharpening method when i first started, and at that point, it was great. I literally took notes from his early video because I hadn't started woodworking, followed the methods end to end and had a sharp iron the first time. So, I used that method as I had old guides, and for testing purposes, I needed to use diamonds so that no iron would be criticized as incompletely sharpened. Stones and sharpening are a side hobby of mine, just like toolmaking.
Cycle time for honing with a diamond plate as a secondary bevel and 1 micron diamonds as tertiary - 4 minutes. Agonizing. That's with ruler trick and then confirmation of wire edge removal since some of the steels have an extreme taste for keeping it.
The guide takes away some of your touch with the iron, even if it's the eclipse type (Which is probably the best type for someone to at least learn a little touch). You can't lean on it, you can't manipulate it as much as freehand. Agonizing.
Cycle time without a guide, same stones, same irons, about 1 minute and 20 seconds. The sharpness difference is effectively nil, and I tested duration of edge life and freehand is within 10% (it may be even on another repetition). That tells me that I may have freehanded slightly less clearance, but it didn't amount to much, and in the balance, I'd much prefer that. Shallower is always possible to match edge life.
As much as it was interesting to plane several miles and see how long irons actually last in a controlled test, it's about 1/20th as important as being able to sharpen well and quickly.
If there is any speculation about edge quality, mine is better than most. Maybe not all, but most.
The scope pictures for the irons came out of the availability of it (as in, i already had it, so no reason not to use, plus it's interesting to see what edges look like on the same piece of wood (as in, do some fail in bits while others do it evenly- in clean wood, the answer is, no really, though the plainer the steel in traditional steels, the more uniform the edge quality will be).
But nothing will teach a new woodworker more than a less durable iron and dimensioning by hand. You'll get good at sharpening quickly.
Other than perhaps richard mcguire (however his name is spelled), I don't think any of the instructor gurus do much dimensioning. Chris Schwarz planes a lot of already flat pine boards, and I've seen sellers squaring wood up in a few videos - it was agonizing. He may have been making more than one point at the time, but it was pretty rough.