Nope . Goal posts fixed. Both are true.MikeG.":1zj4x3tr said:Jacob":1zj4x3tr said:.......Obviously the expensive concrete building would have lower bills - but at what building cost compared to the other?........
And that, ladies and gentleman, is what moving goalposts look like. We've gone from "thermal mass requires spare energy" or something, to "thermal mass costs more.
OscarG":2ldlzs4m said:These 4 pages are pretty much a microcosm of that BBC thread.
OscarG":tt7t7s9p said:These 4 pages are pretty much a microcosm of that BBC thread.
Peterm1000":2axct87w said:OscarG":2axct87w said:These 4 pages are pretty much a microcosm of that BBC thread.
EXACTLY!!!! Even if the face of someone who is clearly an expert, Jacob thinks with a bit of googling he can outdo them!
Jacob":300aagss said:Haven't made a wild statement, haven't seen one dismantled.
So where have I got it wrong then?
n.b. It's a subject I'm particularly interested in and have been for years. Not just off the top of my head.
Also it's better if you point out where I'm wrong rather than just criticising me - it suggests you don't really know what you are talking about. Par for the course with Oscar and Roger - have you joined their merry little band? :lol: :lol:
Rightho. Any questions? :lol: :lol:doctor Bob":ej2eg2k3 said:Jacob, I genuinely believe you are the brightest man I've ever known. You google stuff and your an expert, you seem to have the ability to do this with all sorts. You know all about everything. I met a bloke down the boozer once, he was the same, funny everyone else thought he was a right tool.
Jacob":3ochjjkr said:Rightho. Any questions? :lol: :lol:doctor Bob":3ochjjkr said:Jacob, I genuinely believe you are the brightest man I've ever known. You google stuff and your an expert, you seem to have the ability to do this with all sorts. You know all about everything. I met a bloke down the boozer once, he was the same, funny everyone else thought he was a right tool.
Lons":322pbz3o said:Hmm... The same Chinese who were blamed last year for the release of massive amounts of CFC-11 which they are secretly and illegally using in the production of insulation for the construction industry.
A process banned worldwide since 2010. :roll:
I suspect they would be doing it for the environment too - they are scientifically and technically pretty competent and climate change will zap them too.Rorschach":12jnbxji said:Lons":12jnbxji said:Hmm... The same Chinese who were blamed last year for the release of massive amounts of CFC-11 which they are secretly and illegally using in the production of insulation for the construction industry.
A process banned worldwide since 2010. :roll:
Oh yes, causing lots of pollution in all sorts of areas, I wasn't praising them, they just have the right (sort of) idea in using fossil fuels to build factories that can build renewables.
Also they aren't doing this for fun or for the environment, they are doing it so they can sell the solar panels to us and make a load of money, as they always do.
OscarG":2g2sovkz said:These 4 pages are pretty much a microcosm of that BBC thread.
Trevanion":2uxq51k7 said:OscarG":2uxq51k7 said:These 4 pages are pretty much a microcosm of that BBC thread.
Perhaps this one will also get to 372 pages!
Trevanion":353ug6ib said:......Perhaps this one will also get to 372 pages!
RogerS":2bzqnaqj said:I feel sorry for the OP.
doctor Bob":2hubhov9 said:Apparently it was because to start with he was quite an amusing little chap, but as he got to know more and more and climb the tree of knowledge higher and higher, in the end all you could see was a tiny *******.
Nope . Goal posts fixed. Both are true
Not at all.RobinBHM":1ehndaqa said:Nope . Goal posts fixed. Both are true
No because one is arguing something different.........
Enter your email address to join: