The experienced fitter who put in my windows said if you buy triple glazing in this Country you've been conned. The frames will be for 28mm panels and therefore the gaps will be too small.
Not totally true , but largely so:
For triple glazing to be close to effective with an argon fill you will need 4-12-4-12-4 = 36mm. 28mm panels, I agree, are not effective. 36mm is the installation that we have in our house.
These were purchased before I became interested in glazing technology and we were sold this on the basis that it would reduce road traffic noise substantially and be much more efficient.
Since having these fitted and learning a huge amount , I have always said to customers who have expressed an interest in having their panes "upgraded to triple" (or, as I originally accidentally typed "tripe"!) that triple glazing in the UK is more of a marketing exercise than a real benefit. Here's why: firstly, the temperatures in the UK barely justify the need. Secondly, the overall unit sizes needs to be substantial to maintain decent U and this is almost never possible with an existing 4-20-4 make up. Thirdly, triple glazing doesn't substantially reduce noise but acoustic glass is what should be fitted to do the job properly and, finally (the big one), having been called out to replace misted up panes, triple glazed windows double the risk of a given pane failing because they come with two sets of seals and not one. From an installation/repair perspective, triple glazed units weigh 50% more than their double glazed half brothers and with large picture windows and even with smaller units, they can be really heavy!
Triple glazed units don't cost a whole lot more than double glazed units at wholesale price. The biggest cost is in the frames, fitting, commissions and contribution to the company operating expense. Consequently, the concept can be sold as a major (marketing) advantage while the cost increase is minimal. ... but people get sucked it. If I had my time again, I'd do my best to not have triple glazed units.