Tasky":3ax8h31e said:
Chris S. would've had some obligation at the time (implied or otherwise) at PW to avoid saying things that would slow the sale of advertisers' tools.
We *do* have a lot of vintage tools over here, probably nominally more than you do in the UK, but they are in spots, because not all of the country is old. For example, if you go to flea markets in Connecticut, you'll probably have no problem matching or beating boot sales in the UK. If you go to phoenix, you'll probably find a lot of sand while you're looking for tools that aren't on the ground there.
Chris and others will often talk about how important receipt of a perfectly ready tool is because they are dealing with the most incompetent segment of the woodworking population. Beginners and repeat class takers. The competent woodworkers have their face in their work and they're not really interested in being told what they can and can't do. Class woodworkers often want to be told what to do, and an instructor is going to do two things:
* try to figure out the path of least resistance to having ham handed users holding tools that can work
* ponder then who to send those folks to, and that's going to be friends that they meet at trade shows
I have said a couple of times in the past that I make my own infill planes because paying someone $3000 to make a nice hand finished plane makes little sense from a functional standpoint. I've also criticized $60 marking knives that have $1 of materials in them, and in both cases, I received (on US forums) a rash of PMs saying that "you can't say those things, they're just your opinion". In both cases, they were from vendors who attend the same shows as the folks sending me irate PMs. The way they went about minding my own business was particularly offputting - first pretending to offer a "friendly suggestion" and stating that I probably just didn't know what I was talking about, and then throwing a fit when I said I'd rely on my own opinions.
I am not a "comptent woodworker" compared to any real pros, or super intense amateurs, but I'm far enough along to realize that sooner or later, unless you're just building plain tables or something, you'll have to make or restore some tools. It takes less time to get good at restoring tools (quickly) than it does to puzzle about which premium tools to get.
I'm also far enough along to realize that I prefer vintage tools to new ones, because the aspects of them are slightly better for actually getting work done if you're working mostly with hand tools (the weight, the principles of sharpenability of the irons, the lack of machining perfection on their soles - which means less friction than the premium planes).
When Rob and others make tools (my opinions) and push them, it's certainly good for their pockets to some extent (Rob started out selling his dovetail saw for $699 in the US, and lobbied the other makers to increase their prices, which didn't work, of course - it's not like others hadn't thought about their own businesses), but I'm sure it's also a matter of predictability of what the ham-handers are doing in class. They also have captive audiences in those classes with a me-too kind of thing going. If someone shows up with a saw that's out of nick, they see 10 people around them using the patented class saw, such a person is an ideal candidate for an impulse purchase.
Chris could be worse by miles. I hear he's a nice guy, and I'm sure he is. He also isn't as competent as he's made out to be, but most of his audience doesn't know the difference between him or Alan Peters or George Wilson. And Chris (sometimes referred to as "saw jammer") doesn't handle technique critiques from George very well.